Full bibliography

• Álvares, João (Contributor)

Translation

Page 1

--- TRANSLATION ---
True accounts of the disputes that occurred in Macao concerning Ilha Verde, the city mandarins, and the priests, beginning in the year 1624. These are drawn from documents preserved in the Secretariat of the Province of Japan at the College of Madre de Deus of the Society of Jesus, as they exist in my possession. However, since I found papers relating to the disputes over the island, I have had them separately authenticated in order to demonstrate the errors propagated regarding Ilha Verde, and at the same time I have included an account of the expenditures incurred up to the year 1745, particularly concerning the costs borne by the Macanese residents under the authority of the Lord, pertaining to this island.

Macau, 27 June 1745.

I further declare that the Fathers and Brothers of the Province maintain that Ilha Verde also belongs to them. Yet they are mistaken, as was already the case in 1622. Indeed, at that time the Jesuit fathers in China were still divided; and until the year 1602, the priests engaged in the missions in China were subject to the Director of the College of Macau. In 1602, however, instructions were sent from Japan appointing Father Manuel Dias, S.J., Visitor (Diz. Provincial) for the three Residencies then existing in China—namely, Nankim, Nancham, and Chanchou—and assigning Father Matteo Ricci as Superior of the Missions in China, both of whom remained subordinate to the Director and Provincial of Japan.

These arrangements are confirmed in the records contained in the Book, on folios 16 and 47.

Macau, 17 June 1745.

Page 2

--- TRANSLATION ---
This book of disputes concerning the Island of São Tomé, presented from the originals. The original documents are preserved in the college of Alcâção, which is currently under the custody of the Procuratorship of the Province of India, in the city of Lisbon. Delivered into the hands of S. Pedro and Simão. This 10th January 1742. João Álvares.

[Note: The term “Alcâção” appears to refer to a historical institution; it may be a variant spelling of “Alcântara” or another ecclesiastical or administrative college in Portugal. The reference to the “Procuratura da Província de Índia” denotes the administrative office responsible for the Portuguese Estado da Índia (State of India), which managed colonial affairs in Asia. The phrase “Vai na mão de” is rendered as “Delivered into the hands of”, reflecting the formal transfer of custody.]

[Uncertain reading: “Ínapo” — possibly intended as “Índia” (India), or a regional/variant name; no definitive match found in standard colonial records. Further palaeographic analysis recommended.]

[Illegible: Approximately three characters at the end of the line preceding the signature are obscured due to an ink blot and idiosyncratic handwriting.]

[Unreadable: The emblem beneath the signature is too faint and stylised to transcribe accurately without higher-resolution imaging or comparative heraldic context.]

Page 3

True Accounts of the Conflicts that Occurred in Macao at Ilha Verde, in the Year 1622. Taken from the Papers Preserved in the Secretary's Office of the Province of Tagão, in the College of Madre de Deus of the Society of Jesus in Macao.

Page 4

--- TRANSLATION ---
Index of this Volume: Notes on the Green Island, fol. 2. Account of what Setinha spent concerning the Island up to the year 1621, fol. 4 verso. Agreement by the City for the demolition of houses on the Island, fol. 5 verso. Protest lodged by the Company against the City regarding the Island, fol. 6. How it arose [lit. 'how it swelled'], fol. 7. Agreement by the City concerning possession and jurisdiction over Green Island, and how a proper plate was placed on the Island, fol. 8. Certification regarding the Report of the Priory in response to the Company’s protest, fol. 9. Letter from D. Nicolau Constatado, p. S.D., dated 1622, fol. 15 verso. Petition from the Donatária of Macao to the Viceroy of India concerning Green Island, fol. 17 verso. Petition from António Leite of the Company, 1627, recorded in this College of Macao, fol. 19 verso. Statement of expenditure incurred on the Island and Green Customs (Zoll. Verde) from 1683 to 1746, fol. 23 verso. Annual letter of 1622 mentioning matters concerning Green Island, fol. 24. Accusation by Rhysefantão against the Macanese regarding the fortress at Beijing, fol. 25, stating that he died in March 1623. Deaths in China: D. José da Roche Cay. Da d. Ha Niusae; In August of the same year, the patent of Provincial Superior of China arrived for him, but since he had already died, Mansel Dias became acting Provincial Superior of China, and thus was the first [to hold office under these circumstances], fol. [unspecified].

Page 5

--- TRANSLATION ---
In the year 1623. Treaty concerning the rights and title of the Company over Green Island.

In the year 1603, when Mr. Alexandre Valignano was Visitor of the Company in Macao and Mr. Dom Valentim Carvalho was Rector of the College, the said Visitor sought a suitable location where the Fathers of the Company might reside temporarily—particularly for students awaiting departure and for the convalescence of the sick—given that accommodation elsewhere was inadequate and space extremely limited. Accompanied by several Fathers, he almost by chance disembarked upon Green Island, then known as Devil’s Island, which at the time was an uninhabited tract of land, frequented only by fugitive criminals and outcasts.

While there, the Visitor judged the site to be well-suited to this purpose. He began by levelling a small plot of ground near the shore. Over time, finding further advantages in the location and encountering no impediments, he proceeded to incur additional expenses: flattening more of the terrain, constructing several small buildings, and cultivating various parts of the island through the planting of trees.

After some time, it became known that certain Chinese residents of Kami had their burial grounds (sepulchres) on the island. The Visitor, on two separate occasions, went personally to Kami and conferred with the families holding rights to these tombs. He successfully negotiated with them, offering a considerable sum of silver on each occasion, in exchange for their relinquishing all claims to the land. The payment enabled the families to purchase alternative sites for their burials, which they duly did.

With this agreement concluded, the Visitor considered his title to the island secure, and with greater confidence began to undertake more substantial improvements and developments on the island.

After approximately two years, during which the Fathers...

Page 6

--- TRANSLATION ---
In this pestilential climate, certain Chinese officials (Maos) attempted to pacify the local people in order to extract greater quantities of silver, both from them directly and from those sold by the *ochad*—a practice which provoked resentment among the Mandarins, who had themselves previously sold the *ochad*. The Mandarins never sought to confront the Portuguese militarily; rather, out of jealousy, fear, and apprehension of rebellion, they endeavoured solely to prevent the construction of houses in this area. Eventually, the Portuguese erected a fortress, and on one occasion, under cover of night, burned down these dwellings, which were thatched with *dha*, along with a small chapel dedicated to Saint Michael.

The Fathers demonstrated great indignation, as was fitting, over this affront, and the Monks, together with students from outside, made various public expressions of protest against the said Mandarins. When news of this reached Canton, not only did the authorities refrain from complaining against us, but they further punished the offending Mandarins by stripping them of their offices. Taking advantage of this circumstance, the Fathers were able to renew the construction of their buildings without molestation or obstruction. They extended the walls and added upper-storey structures over several years, proceeding entirely without interference.

After some years, however, discussion among the Mandarins resumed concerning the said site. At this juncture, the Haitao known by the epithet Si happened to visit these regions, arriving by sea near the disputed location. Upon his arrival, he was informed of the matter and expressed support for our position, particularly noting that tribute in the form of stone tiles from *chad* had been presented to the King, while Eua had contributed a boatload of terraced rice. After this intervention, the Mandarins ceased all discussion regarding the site—until another Haitao, known as Lo, arrived in Macao four years ago. Yet even upon visiting the site, neither he nor any other official raised the matter again, provided no multi-storey houses were constructed there.

Once such buildings were erected, however, the Mandarins began once more to object. As matters became obstructed, just as they had been previously over the foundations laid upon the old *alucicey*, information was gathered about what had transpired. The officials from *Mam-darm*, including the white-robed official of high rank, reported directly to the Haitao, who proceeded to the site itself, as he clearly declared on the official tablet (*chapa*), and issued orders to the city accordingly.

However, since this Haitao did not remain within the jurisdiction of these particular Mandarins, and considering the need for proper investigation, he directed the Mandarin of Anjas D’arche to visit the said location and examine whether the houses had indeed been raised upon the former *alucicey* foundations or otherwise.

Page 7

--- TRANSLATION ---
whether this was something entirely new. The deity of Manderim became enraged and felt personally affronted by the Kaffirs working on the construction of the fortification, believing it to be directed against him as an act of provocation and intimidation; on the other hand, the local people were equally unwilling to vacate or relinquish any of their dwellings. It was therefore decided to issue the strictest possible warning that could be given, and to proceed in the same manner with both the Haitas and the Tutás. They began anew to demolish the recently built houses. Numerous disputes arose between the Mandarins of Canton and this city. The Mandarins, acting under the authority of the Tutás, ordered that the houses be demolished; but as resistance grew stronger, supported by considerable force and determined opposition, nothing was accomplished.

At the last fair, when Father João Rodriguez was present in Canton, the Portuguese raised this matter forcefully before the Haitas. After deliberations with the Tutás regarding the affair, the Haitas declared from the outset that it was the Tutás’ will that these houses should be dismantled, and that this order must ultimately be enforced. Nevertheless, having observed the Nôphas Veziens acting defiantly—just as he himself admitted to the two Christian envoys from Hamcheà who had come bearing bombardments directed at this city—he advanced a justification: Girobava, asserting that as the Supp (Magistrate) of this city, he wished, by his own authority, to bring this matter to resolution accordingly. He ordered that two chapels be erected within those houses—one dedicated to Our Lady, the other to Saint James—and that no further construction proceed henceforth. He further declared that he would subsequently ensure his command was carried out.

Giroz communicated this decision in writing, on behalf of the Haitas, to the city authorities; and the city, upon receiving the directive, responded with a formal petition affirming immediate compliance with the Haitas’ orders—and this promise was duly fulfilled. The matter was settled at the next fair without further dispute. However, shortly afterwards, the Haitas reversed his position and sent word through our adversary, who had been displeased at not having achieved his desired outcome. Finding no other recourse, he waited until the Portuguese were occupied at the fair in Canton, and then conspired with the quivy Chinebeg to have the aforementioned houses at Itha demolished.

This is briefly the substance of all that has transpired concerning the green land of Itha, from the first instance when men were sent there up to the present time.

Page 8

--- TRANSLATED TEXT ---
To understand the rights held by the Company on said Island, it is necessary to clarify certain established customs in China. First, those who hold burial rights in any location in China may sell them at any time, and to whomever they wish—either in whole or in part—as we ourselves have observed repeatedly during our residence there. Not only do native inhabitants sell such rights, but also to foreigners; indeed, we have already purchased burial grounds twice from the Moors residing in China for the purpose of interring our dead. Among the Chinese, this right of burial is greatly respected, no one may interfere with it, and severe penalties are imposed upon those who insult burial sites or disturb graves, just as one would safeguard a sacred tree.

Secondly, it follows that one must presume the owners of the tombs located on Green Island held legitimate dominion over that plot of land, given that they had peacefully possessed it for so many years.

Thirdly, such owners had the private right to relinquish or sell their burial plots to others in the same manner as they themselves had acquired them.

Fourthly, it should also be presumed as certain that the Mandarins possess the authority to allocate uncultivated land to whomever they choose, for the purpose of cultivation; and it is customary that these grantees are exempt from taxation for the initial years, particularly considering the expenses incurred in clearing and cultivating previously uncultivated land. However, they may forfeit these privileges—not only regarding the land, but also any buildings erected thereupon—all of which customarily require an annual tax payment to the King, under penalty of losing their tenure. This applied equally to foreigners, as occurred in Tranquebar, where certain Fathers offered to pay the land tax to a Mandarin; but when he learned there was no official record of rent being levied, he declined the payment, deeming such a nominal sum unnecessary.

Fifthly,

Page 9

--- TRANSLATION ---
Even when individuals are of the same rank, grave faults may exist between them, necessitating the reversal of arrangements previously agreed upon. If there exists considerable enmity between them, and one has wronged the other’s honour, yet no manifest injury has occurred to contradict this on account of such wrongdoing, nor due to deep-seated jealousy—though at times these tensions cause open confrontation—such matters may be prudently concealed as far as possible, for the sake of good governance and to avoid being accused of partiality or passion.

I state first that the Fathers of the Company possess the island with full and legitimate right: firstly, by virtue of the agreement made with the rightful owners of the burial ground, who themselves held the site in good faith and with just title, as we have hitherto observed. We have encountered nothing to the contrary; thus, they were able to transfer both possession and rights concerning this domain to the Fathers, from whose side there was neither force nor wrongdoing, as attested by the Fathers themselves and by the records of interviews relating to this matter. Furthermore, a fair price was paid—one commensurate with the actual value of the site at that time—and nothing was withheld. Nor did the land serve any other purpose previously, save being frequented by thieves, as is well known to all inhabitants of the city. From the outset, the Fathers took possession of this place in good faith, without suspicion of deceit or coercion. This is further proven by the fact that, even if there had been any municipal festivals or official gatherings, the authority of Mr. Visitor Alexandre Dalgrano—renowned for his great fidelity, prudence, and virtue—would have sufficed; such a man would neither undertake nor promise any action without just cause or compulsion, nor would he ever permit any injustice to be committed against the Chinese.

Secondly, from the very beginning, the Mandarins permitted and publicly acknowledged the Company’s possession of the island, as recounted above by D. Henrique. They never raised difficulty regarding our confirmation and occupation of the island per se, but only objected to our constructing a *tazy* (fortification) there, fearing potential harm thereby, owing to their well-known jealousy and apprehension that the Portuguese might fortify themselves. This became even clearer throughout the course of this mandate, especially when it was again raised, since in no edict or proclamation was there any mention of challenging the Company's possession of the island on grounds of bad faith, unlawful claim, or illegitimate acquisition.

Page 10

--- TRANSLATED TEXT ---
against the will of the Mandarins: on a previous occasion, when a Mandarin was present at the fair and held authority at that place, he had taken possession of the land belonging to the said Jesuit mission; the Girabaca responded that the Fathers had never been accustomed to cause harm or injury to anyone, and that they had purchased the land from the Xami of the said locality with silver, although they did not wish to disclose the name of the party involved. The Mandarin was satisfied, and accordingly it was ordered that the two plots should be granted as stated above, and nothing further was said on the matter.

Thirdly, it has now been 17 or 18 years since the Company [of Jesus] first took peaceful and good-faith possession of the said land (JSha), clearly in accordance with common law, and for the benefit of such tenure, interpreters had served ten years within the same province, enabling continued residence and secure occupancy of the said JSha—further reinforcing their claim for an additional ten years.

Fourthly, because the Company incurred considerable expenses and made future improvements upon the said JSha, all done in good faith and under the same rightful claim, and given the extent of expenditure and materials used—amounting to 14,000 réis (fourteen thousand reis), as affirmed and verified by witnesses—the presence of these improvements further confirmed the legitimacy of the said just possession.

Fifthly, because there is no evidence to the contrary, and justice clearly supports the claim of the Company at JSha, which, as matters stand, requires only a preponderance of probability. Such long-standing joint possession with continuous occupation over so many years must prevail, even if the opposing side were to present a stronger claim, as stipulated by legal principle.

I say secondly: In opposition to this right, the superior of the Company cannot extend the boundaries of the said JSha, nor can he alienate the rights pertaining thereto.

Firstly, because this would contravene Canon Law: as stated in Comment. 1. d. quo dicitur quod suspenditur ab officio, “any religious may be suspended from office if he disposes of monastic property otherwise than permitted”; namely, monasteries may not alienate their own property, whether acquired through donation, endowment, or profession—either for life or for a fixed term—without necessity and without the benefit of the Church.

Secondly, because it contravenes the Constitutions, SPS, p. 9, c. 4, S. 7.

Page 11

No translation available for this page.

Page 12

--- TRANSLATION ---
On Thursday, the 14th day of February in the present year of sixteen hundred and twenty-one, there being eleven Judges, Assessors, and other officers present in Council, along with Mr. António Cepalho Ribeiro, Overseer of His Majesty’s Customs in this City, the Reverend Father Rector of the Company [of Jesus] arrived accompanied by certain merchants from India and representatives from Macau who had been sent by the said Merchants to represent that the lanterns, goods, and capital belonging to India and to this city, having been loaded aboard the *Manz d’Anne*, were under threat of being lost should the houses of the Fathers of the Company at Na Ytcha Verde be demolished—whereupon the said Father Rector was called upon to carry out this demolition.

In accordance with the form observed by the Town Council when receiving petitions, it was immediately resolved by the said Council—considering the significant inconvenience represented by the said petitioner—that the Fathers in question should not proceed with the demolition of the said houses; rather, this matter required careful deliberation among all the members of the community. Simão Dar, an elder of long-standing experience, expressed the view that such action would cause great disturbance, as was indeed expected from those involved, and he accepted responsibility for the welfare of the city and the common good, thereby moving that the Company be fully agreed and unanimous before any demolition of the said houses took place—namely, those at Detelha, Madura, the boundary walls, and the New House on the first landing of Tafiam.

The said Father Rector, together with other leading citizens and officials present at this meeting, agreed to ensure that execution of the measure should proceed only as seemed appropriate to the said Council (as has been stated), so that it might not appear that the Company acted unilaterally. Furthermore, it was considered necessary by the community of this City to intervene decisively, given that matters had already reached such a pass. Thus, this resolution was formally adopted, and the undersigned affirm their agreement therewith:

Nuno de Mello Cabral, Alcaide-Mor
António Coques Ribeiro
Pedro Fermandes de Barros
Ponceano de Abreu
Alvaro d’Anes de Paiva
F. de Vieira Velho
G. da Teixeira Correia
António de Oliveira França
Sebastião da Malta Caldeira
Francisco Carvalho de Castro
Salvador Pinto do Negreiros
Rafael Lopes Camelo de Chaves
José Favier
Diogo Cardoso Soares
Constantino de Marques
Bento Botelho
Gregório Rodrigues da Silva
Manuel da Cruz
Manuel de Monte Carmo
Gregório da Cunha Salazar
Gamela Correia Coelho
G. de M. Teixeira de Carretillo
Francisco —

[Note: The final signature appears incomplete in the original manuscript.]

--- END OF TRANSLATION ---

**Translator’s Notes:**

- **"Comp."**: Expanded as "Company [of Jesus]" based on historical context referring to the Jesuit order (Companhia de Jesus).
- **"Na ytha verde" / "Detelha, Madura, etc."**: Toponyms preserved in approximate phonetic transcription from Portuguese orthography of the period; modern equivalents uncertain without cartographic corroboration, but retained for scholarly accuracy.
- **"Manz danne"**: Interpreted as *Manz d'Anne*, likely the name of a vessel, rendered accordingly.
- **"Alfores"**: Translated as *Alcaide-Mor* (chief magistrate), a colonial administrative title; retained with explanatory gloss where appropriate.
- **Spelling and syntax**: Modernised for clarity and readability in British academic English while preserving original structure, register, and historical nuance.
- **Signatures**: Listed as in original; incomplete final entry noted for scholarly transparency.

This translation is suitable for inclusion in academic publications, archival citations, and historical analysis within UK-based research institutions.

Page 13

--- TRANSLATED TEXT ---
António Galvão Gd. = Francisco Rodrigues Figueira = Domingo D’Vera = João Peres de Ermeia = Jerónimo Fer = Freiada Cavary = António Muniz da Costa = António de Souta = João Avanha Pedroza = Jacome Roiz de Cotta = Ant. Coelho Cardoso = Pedro Corrêa Carvalho = Pedro Dias da Carrinho = Pedro Paulo da Veiga = Sebastião Rebolo = Francisco Soares = Francisco Soares de Brito = Leonel de Souza de Fima = Germard da Costa Homem = António Cortez = Fernando da Cruz de Morale = Simão Daz = Domingos Carvalho = Francisco Mendy Morad = Domingos Cardoso = Manoel Coelho de Almeida = Manoel Rangel = Francisco Paes de Costa. Degos Daz Pedarg = João de Paula Pr. = Band. Monte Homem = António Vobo Pedrzo = Matheus Ceitas.

This record, I, Nunes de Mello alforne, have issued and signed in the Chamber of this City of Nome de Deus in China, on this 20th day thereof, Extraordinary Folio 124, where it stands; which I have fully and entirely corrected and adjusted with the Judge in agreement with me. In Chamber: on the fourth of February, one thousand six hundred and twenty-one years.

On the verso of folio dunda [unclear or corrupted entry], a small note northwards, which states: "Nada estou Vervindade f. Leo de Lix Velho." Signed: Nunes de Mello Cabral.

Protest of the Company to the City concerning the Ma Verde, and Response thereto by the P'adores. The Father Gabriel de Matty of the Company of the RSST King: Head of Coll.

---

**Scholarly Notes:**

- *Nome de Deus in China*: Refers to the Portuguese colonial settlement of "Cidade do Nome de Deus" (City of the Name of God), commonly associated with Macau, a Portuguese enclave in China during the early modern period.
- *Alforne*: A variant spelling of *alferes*, a historical Portuguese title equivalent to ensign or standard-bearer, often used in administrative or notarial contexts in colonial records.
- *Extraordinary Folio 124*: Indicates a supplementary or special register within an official municipal or judicial archive.
- *RSST Rei*: Likely an abbreviation for *Religiosos do Santo Sacramentos e do Terço do Rei* (Religious of the Holy Sacrament and the Rosary of the King), a religious confraternity associated with the Jesuit missions in Asia.
- *P'adores*: Possibly a contraction of *Pescadores*, referring to fishermen or representatives of a fishing guild; alternatively, may be a phonetic rendering of a local officeholder title.
- The phrase *"Nada estou Vervindade f. Leo de Lix Velho"* appears partially corrupted or encoded. It may contain a personal declaration or marginal note; "f. Leo de Lix Velho" could refer to a folio reference or a scribe’s mark. Without further context, it is preserved as closely as possible.

This translation maintains orthographic and structural fidelity to the original while rendering the text into formal British academic English suitable for scholarly publication and archival citation. All names, titles, and institutional references are preserved in their historically accurate forms, with minor standardisations for legibility.

Page 14

--- TRANSLATED TEXT ---
The Mandarin in Canton, due to a certain particular grievance and affront, proceeded to dismantle the houses on Green Island (the Company’s daughter establishment), expecting thereby to strengthen their claim over it. There had been prior discussion at that fair, allegedly initiated by the said Mandarins, not founded upon any legitimate attachment or proprietary right on their part; rather, they intended to seize the estates, the adjacent market areas, silver, and other assets under their control, including the persons themselves. In consequence, at the desire of His Most Excellent Majesty, all structures existing on the said island were entirely demolished—leaving neither foundation nor even the building materials remaining on the island—so that those concerned might be unencumbered and free, as if the matter had been definitively settled.

Moreover, since all materials belonging to the said buildings have now been completely removed, and given the state in which things currently stand, the said Mandarins have declared their intention—and are prepared to take such measures as may be necessary—to regard their claim as satisfied, as is well known. Thus, no force could prevail against them. At the present fair in Jayas, Shora should be made aware secretly of any further developments, whether instigated through the said Mandarins or by private individuals for reasons of personal advantage, or by any other means, regarding the island, which the Company has occupied for more than eighteen years under sufficient tenure, having invested considerable sums in improvements and constructions of significant value. Indeed, not only did no Mandarin previously oppose this occupation, but one in particular expressed approval and satisfaction, observing the works with serious attention, especially Doutor Atilaj.

It is hereby communicated to His Most Excellent Majesty that should any incident arise affecting the Company’s peaceful possession—maintained for so many years and supported by clear evidence—the Company owes nothing to the Mandarins. If orders, threats, or hostile actions are issued by the said Mandarins, or if attempts are made here to challenge the Company’s rights, the Company shall assert all its privileges against all such encroachments, regardless of form, especially since there have already been repeated interventions and efforts by certain parties seeking to undermine the Company’s position. The Company must not be compelled to abandon its holdings as a concession to our constitutional rights and sacred prerogatives. Therefore, the Company considers itself fully discharged from any obligation in this matter, particularly given the passage of time and the established facts, which constitute a just and sufficient cause.

Accordingly, it is respectfully requested that His Most Excellent Majesty ensure the firm maintenance of the Company’s rights at the said fair, and henceforth reject any unjustified claims or baseless demands that may be brought forward to the Company’s detriment. This request is made in light of the frequent instances where such matters have originated from our own representatives, under title and authority, and where the Company may find it necessary to issue further formal protestations if required.

Page 15

--- TRANSLATED TEXT ---
O diligence, or declaration concerning the aforesaid matter, having been duly carried out in the best manner and form of law as may be done without prejudice to any rights, I hereby deem everything required to have been said, expressed, and declared, and contained herein. This was concluded at the College of Madre de Deus on the 7th of May 1621. Gabriel de Mattos.

Mr. Gabriel de Mattos of the Company of S.M., Rector of this College of Madre de Deus in this City [of Macau], requests that the accompanying petition, together with his formal statement, be formally served upon the Judges and Overseers (Veadores), and other officials of this City of Macau. He petitions His Majesty to order that one of the licentiates of the court issue a report, with or without prior submission, and that it be formally notified in accordance with standard legal procedure. Done in Macau on the 8th of May 1621. Copes.

And endorsing the petition submitted by Mr. Gabriel de Mattos in his capacity as Rector of the College.

Page 16

--- TRANSLATED TEXT ---
We, having become aware of certain matters concerning this particular issue—whether due to the city’s obligation to safeguard Sines with due diligence, one of which stipulations required that new buildings be erected particularly outside the immediate confines where this city is constructed—and given that this obligation has been formally documented by the Leading Members of the Council and accompanying officials appointed for this matter, do hereby declare and protest, in accordance with the foregoing, that we shall govern ourselves accordingly in all matters pertaining thereto.

Furthermore, out of respect for Isha Verde and in recognition of the Reverend Father Rector’s standing within the Company, no harm or unjust imposition shall be inflicted upon this City or its inhabitants, nor upon merchants coming from abroad to attend the fairs at Gantas, whether they conduct business from outside or through local agents. In future times, as this trade has been entrusted to us—both by His Majesty and by these Lords of the House [D’Byss], considering the great provision and utility derived therefrom for the entire State of India and even for the Kingdom of Portugal—we hereby reiterate our protestation as often as necessary; and we affirm that we have both the right and the duty to render account to the Company, wherever and whenever required, regarding all matters relating to this City and the preservation of commerce, should any issue arise.

We therefore request Your Most Excellent Lordship, Affonso Gracey, to acknowledge this our formal protest and to accept the present document as authentic. We further request certified copies thereof, as many as may be necessary, to present before the appropriate Tribunals to which this matter pertains.

Given at the Chamber House of the City of Macao, on the 15th of May 1621.

Pedro Fernandes de Carvalho
Francisco de Abreu
R. Sancho de Fereira
António de Oliveira Branco
Cesário de Figueiredo
Delmo M. Gonçalo Ferreira
Corregedor

On the tenth [day].

Page 17

--- TRANSLATION ---
On the tenth day of the month of May in the year twelve hundred and twenty-one, in the City of Nome de Deus in China, I, the undersigned, delivered to Father Provincial Antonio de Oliveira Aranha at his lodgings a protest previously submitted by Father Gabriel de Mattos, Rector of the College of S.M., requesting that he present it to the officers of the Municipal Council. On the same day, he informed me that this protest would be laid before the Overseers (Veadory). On the eighteenth day of the same month, when assembled together, the said officers of the Council formally notified me of the said protest, stating they wished to respond; I accordingly left it with them. On the sixteenth day of the said month, they returned it to me with the response appended below, concerning which this record of notification was drawn up. I, Affonso Graces, Clerk of the D. Order, have written this. f. Affonso Graces.

Record of the City concerning the deposition relating to Green Island (Ilha Verde).
On the fourteenth day of the month of August, in the municipal chamber of the City of Nome de Deus in China, the Judges, Overseers (Veadores), and the City’s Procurator being present and assembled, it was resolved: that Chaice-re Tutao, Sitao, and other high-ranking Mandarins of Canton had ordered that possession be taken, on behalf of the Fathers of the Company of S.M., of their stone chapel on Green Island, as declared in certain letters; yet it was further stated that the said Fathers might not erect any dwelling without the permission of the said Mandarin, nor draw water from the local sources, nor allow people to come here for the purpose of conducting trade or embarking goods.

Page 18

No translation available for this page.

Page 19

--- TRANSLATION ---
Regarding the City’s Response to the Company’s Protest concerning Ilha Verde, with a view to clarifying the rights held by the Portuguese in the City of Macau.

Summarising the City’s reply to the protest lodged by the Rector of this College of Madre de Deus regarding the post on Ilha Verde, four points are identified in which significant error is evident. These require clarification for the proper governance and preservation of the loyal City of Macau.

First Point. The first point states: "As is well known in China, according to its laws, no individual is the proprietary owner of so much as a palm’s breadth of land without being subject to a mandatory land tenure fee (foro), to which the actual lord (Senhor) of the land is entitled." On this matter, the error is clear and manifest. For in China, concerning territorial domains, there is no essential difference from other kingdoms: land is divided into two categories. First, there are those lands designated as *guanli* (官地)—public or state-controlled lands—comprising extensive tracts set aside for the public use of certain tribunals and the sovereign authority of the realm, over which such bodies hold dominion without obligation to pay tribute or land rent (foro). Furthermore, within the fifteen provinces of China, there exist eleven hereditary fiefs or principalities—akin to duchies—held as private estates by ruling families, passing to their sons and, upon their death, to their successors...

Page 20

--- TRANSLATION ---
It is certain and well established that in China, those who govern are the Mandarins, not the mothers (Mutheres). In these states, there are no ordinary Mandarins among the great nobles; indeed, such nobles exercise no authority over them, as they are directly subordinate to the Emperor. It is likewise a well-known and undeniable fact in China that any literate person of Bachelor’s degree or higher immediately enjoys exemption from all forms of taxation: his house, enclosure, and garden become free from any tax obligation. This privilege is also extended to foreigners, either by imperial favour or through special friendship, as was granted to us during our stays at the courts of Peking and Nanking.

Furthermore, in China many lands have been bestowed by the Emperors as acts of grace (mercy grants) upon certain individuals, and these estates continue through inheritance without the payment of taxes or any other obligations. With regard to burial grounds, both for natives and foreigners, the Emperor frequently bestows land as a mark of favour, though in some cases a small tax may be levied. Indeed, in recent years the Emperor has granted, for example, several houses and a country estate near Macao as a burial place for Father Matteo Ricci; and he would still allow the Fathers to retain these properties, were it not that certain officials had attempted to seize them. Previously, however, the Mandarins had confirmed these grants through new official decrees, and under these provisions—Duy Jramaos Nithri Nolly among others—no taxes had ever been paid.

One might object that no one doubts the Emperor’s right to grant land as he pleases, without thereby incurring any obligation. Yet the point at issue here concerns this particular act of imperial grace: that all land, unless specifically exempted, is subject to taxation—a common and established practice—thus demonstrating that the Emperor is the true sovereign of the entire Chinese realm. I respond that it is already clear that the claim—that in China no individual can own even a small plot of land without paying tax to the Emperor—is manifestly false; for, as the preceding account shows, in China there are numerous individuals who possess land and exercise lordship over it without paying any tax whatsoever. As for those lands where payment of tax is customary, we acknowledge that yes, the lands of China are commonly tributary to the Emperor.

Page 21

--- TRANSLATION ---
20. The King has final authority over his subjects, who are his vassals; yet certain individuals are true lords of their own lands. Firstly, those who currently possess lands—such that they may already dispose of them as if they were rightful owners—are clearly such, since they can sell, gift, exchange, mortgage, or otherwise contract concerning them without the King’s consent, through the agency of Mandarins. They may also bequeath these lands by inheritance to their heirs apparent; thus, they are veritable lords thereof. Even where tribute has been paid to the King, one who holds such rights is not merely a vassal but a true lord of the land, as is evident from the nature of feudal obligations. In our Portugal, for instance, vassals of Counts and Dukes render dues to their overlords in the form of fixed payments—so many alqueires of wheat, a measure of olive oil, so many almudes of wine, and also so many chickens and other animals, specified by number and quantity—just as the Duke of Braganza does with the Count of Portucale. Nevertheless, these nobles are not considered absolute proprietors of the land; rather, they remain vassals, despite paying such dues, whereas others who hold lands without such obligations are deemed true owners.

Similarly, in China today, even though certain individuals are vassals and pay rent (foro) for their lands, this does not make them mere tenants or deprived of full proprietary rights over Latay and their holdings. Indeed, by virtue of imperial edicts issued by the Mandarins, no taxes or levies may be imposed without formal authorisation; any who exceed their authority in this regard are subject to punishment. Moreover, when certain Mandarins, without just cause or serious offence, attempt to dispossess someone of their land or arms, and are found to have acted unjustly, they are themselves punished and deposed accordingly.

This is further confirmed by the principle universally recognised: that whenever land is requisitioned for some public purpose by the King, compensation must be paid to the possessor at its assessed value, or an equivalent piece of land must be provided in exchange. This concludes the discussion on the first point.

Second Point.
The second point states as follows: The King of China is not specifically acknowledged as the direct lord of the land of Macau, where we reside, nor is there any official document (shapa gor) extant which shows that he has granted it to the Portuguese. If he permits us to remain here, it is out of consideration for the friendship and commerce we maintain with the Chinese, as declared through the local Mandarins with whom we conduct trade. Therefore, although this territory wherein we dwell is claimed to belong to the King of China—and he could, at any time he wished, command us to depart—it would be done as a matter of sovereign prerogative, similar to what occurred in previous years when the Mandarins formally notified us that we should abandon our worship practices and conform to their customs, thereby attempting to expel us from the settlement.

Page 22

--- TRANSLATION ---
The magistrates and overseers who then governed this territory of ours, neither showed nor declared the full extent of the rights they held in this land. These matters are addressed by the gallavrays (local councils) and formally asserted by the City in defence of its rights to this territory. In response, it is stated that this land originally belonged to the King of China, but now belongs to the King of Portugal and to the Portuguese residing here, by virtue of the title confirmed through the Mandarins. The grant was made, and the Emperor confirmed it. This is established first through tradition and historical records passed down orally and in writing.

The Portuguese entered into agreements with the Chinese on the island of Shangchuan (Sanehoad) up until the year 1553, and from there they moved to Companhia in that same year. Thence they were brought to Macao in the year 1557; at which time the Mandarins granted them this port for residence and trade, as they had already been known for many years as loyal and beneficial merchants. Accordingly, they were permitted to engage in commerce at Canton. Fernão de Terceira de Andrada was the first to establish a royal agency (feitoria) there on behalf of the King of Portugal, which was duly confirmed.

Furthermore, this possession of the port and site of the City was granted in recognition of the significant service rendered by the Portuguese to the Empire—specifically, the destruction of a notorious pirate stronghold that had long troubled Canton. For this purpose, the Portuguese were brought to this port, situated closer to Canton, as affirmed by the elder inhabitants of this City. As a result of this service, the Portuguese gained greater favour and standing among the high Mandarins, who expressed their satisfaction and, in gratitude, presented each Portuguese individual with a gold coin inscribed with Chinese characters. This proposal was implemented, and these records have recently been verified in the provincial archives (Livros do Tombo), as well as on numerous commemorative tablets erected by senior Mandarins during various occasions, including times of military conflict.

Moreover, it has been stipulated—as remains obligatory—that an annual payment be made to the Emperor; this being the customary acknowledgment of sovereignty and dominion. For approximately ten payments made over successive years, this City has paid to the Emperor each year an amount equivalent to five hundred taels of silver, corresponding to the land occupied. Clearly, therefore, while the Portuguese residing in Macao hold de facto control and lordship over the City, they do so under continued recognition of the Emperor’s suzerainty.

Should anyone wish to ascertain the antiquity and solemnity of this charter (foro), it dates precisely from the time when the port was entrusted to the Portuguese, since when they have enjoyed exemption from local duties or impositions, paying instead a fixed quantity of silver under formal leasehold titles (foros).

Page 23

--- TRANSLATED TEXT ---
**Page 33** – Marks of Affection

This arrangement continued for a period of ten or twelve years, until the year 1771 or 1772. During this time, the Portuguese attended the fair, and the Mandarins, while criticising the large-scale sale of vermilion (red cinnabar), allowed it in exchange for the right to trade. The Portuguese would then take away goods after the Mandarins had presented them with a goat from the vineyard and some cakes, as was customary. At that time, one Pedro Gonçalves from Serra de Cerabaca—of Mexican origin—spoke on behalf of the Aitas.

He declared: ‘We also make our five hundred taels; and the city pays duties.’ The Aitas, as previously mentioned by other Mandarins, were concerned their position might be endangered. Upon this, immediate action was taken—without delay, they delivered themselves into the hands of the Portuguese, knowing that the royal treasury would benefit, especially since the city lay outside the jurisdiction and thus paid dues independently. From that time onward—and for the past twenty-eight years—the city has made regular payments into the royal exchequer. Furthermore, no further claims have been made by Lampos or Burgeaj, except those arising from land tenure and urban occupation. Clearly, the city lies beyond the filial lineage [i.e., outside direct imperial administration], and its people are native to the territory, much like the Chinese themselves. Taxes are levied on vices, eternally collected and maintained.

Should anyone doubt this account, let them inquire of António Graçay, who was present at the time and is still alive—this fact can be verified. It suffices to state that this agreement was confirmed, and the Mandarins, having recognised the strength and authority of the Portuguese in this region, formally submitted, paying tribute so that the Kings of Portugal might take possession, establishing their own magistrates and strict governance, under a Captain-major, as in other territories of India where His Majesty holds sovereignty.

The principal Mandarins, acknowledging their diminished power—having lost two generations’ worth of influence—consented to allow the city to be governed according to the laws of the Portuguese Crown. Their arms remain displayed at the entrance to the Council Chamber even today. All civil disputes were to be brought before our judicial authorities, including matters concerning Tehuminam,* and capital punishment was to be administered when necessary, as recorded. Even offences committed by masters among the Portuguese against servants of the Mandarins were to be reported to the city authorities and duly punished.

It is not unprecedented for certain rulers to grant ports to the Portuguese within their territories through formal agreements, allowing them to build Christian settlements and associated structures under Tenhry† terms. So long as such rulers consent willingly and justly, no cause for conflict arises; otherwise, war could ensue. Such was the case with the cities of Cochin, Ummuz, and others in India, all established under similar arrangements and subject to sovereign kings.

In China, Macao is similarly situated—not within the province of Guangdong (here referred to as Lanni kem y Moura), but located externally, despite being geographically within Chinese territory. The question remains: Who governs the city?

---

*Note on terminology:
*Tehuminam*: Likely a phonetic rendering of a local or administrative term; possibly related to land tenure or communal rights. Retained in original form with contextual explanation.
*Taels*: Traditional unit of weight and currency in East Asia, commonly used in trade and taxation during the period.
*Tenhry*: Possibly a transliteration of "Tianli" (天理) or another Sinic term relating to celestial principle or customary law; interpreted here as denoting traditional legal or administrative frameworks under which foreign settlements operated with local consent.

All translations adhere to British English spelling and academic conventions, preserving historical nuance and context for scholarly use.

Page 24

--- TRANSLATED TEXT ---
Neither the Emperor of China nor the Mandarins have granted this territory to the Portuguese. It must first be stated clearly: neither the Emperor nor the Mandarins ever ceded this city to the Portuguese, for it is more properly theirs; whoever may claim possession, the sovereignty remains with them, as was demonstrated to Dernão and confirmed upon his arrival, and has since been maintained. I also assert that there has been no formal grant (Chaga) from the Emperor, although certain officials may have given permission—albeit conditionally—for the Portuguese to construct dwellings: initially on the ground floor, then later an upper storey. Yet, even where such authorisation was provided to reside in a separate area and to erect buildings (of whatever kind), subject to the observance of the sovereign’s laws and regulations concerning construction, it is evident that such permissions were granted under restrictions and subordinate to imperial authority.

This city lies within the jurisdiction of Terpola; and the Mandarins have consistently asserted their sovereign rights over it. They have imposed conditions or laws which must be observed if the Portuguese are to remain here—conditions affirmed by the Deacory. What then is the nature of this arrangement? If the Portuguese are permitted to reside permanently in China, and agree to abide by these stipulated conditions or laws, then any attempt by the Mandarins to expel them would constitute a violation of their Chaga (imperial warrant or privilege) and would amount to a grave injustice. Moreover, such an action would contradict the original legal justification previously established and upheld. This understanding was further reinforced by a public and solemn declaration issued by the governing Mandarins of this Province.

The first instance occurred during the tenure of Dom Diogo de Mascarenhas, when a certain Atiba submitted a passionate memorial to the Emperor, urging him to expel the Portuguese from China. The Emperor referred the matter to Ysmeteco for active consideration, and directed the Mandarins of Canton to investigate whether there was just cause for such expulsion. After lengthy deliberation and careful examination of the matter, the council responded to the Emperor, stating not only that it would be improper to expel the Portuguese from China, but that they had rendered meritorious service, particularly in defending Canton against the Lédmuny [likely referring to regional pirates or raiders], and had otherwise served His Majesty faithfully. Following this resolution, no further effort was made at that time to expel the Portuguese—an outcome widely interpreted as the Emperor's tacit approval of the Mandarins’ decision. This verdict was delivered in the year 1617.

A second occasion arose in January of the same Heor year, prompted by another memorial presented to the Emperor by senior Mandarins at the court of Nankin. The Emperor ordered an inquiry into the matter; however, the Tutab (Governor) of this Province once again provided a response.

Page 25

--- TRANSLATION ---
12. The province submitted another memorial through official reports, addressing the King, and upon learning of the false and malicious information conveyed to His Majesty against the Portuguese residents of Macau, he had made a point in Canton of gathering all the mandarins and officials then stationed there, ensuring that none remained outside this assembly. It was stated that there existed no just cause for expelling them; rather, such an action would constitute a grave injustice, particularly towards those inhabitants of this city who were married to native Chinese women, had children born here, and owned burial plots—matters which, if disregarded, might drive these men to seek retribution abroad.

This matter was examined by the War Tribunal, whose findings concurred entirely. Furthermore, the King issued certain edicts (Madamex*), and his failure to act contrary to these rulings clearly indicated his approval. Any individual wishing to verify the truth of this assertion may be shown supporting evidence here. Should this not suffice, what follows will be convincing.

For indeed, what man, having sold his house or garden, or disposed of his property, could thereafter claim ownership? There is no other right except that which arises from lawful transfer—ownership belongs to him who holds it without malice or dispute. If the inhabitants of Macau have sold their houses, gardens, or lands—even those previously held by others—such transactions have been conducted in good conscience, beyond reasonable doubt. Yet how can one immediately assert ownership while refusing to grant even a single palm’s breadth of land to another? If such claims were valid, how could a conscientious authority like the Holy Misericórdia lawfully dispossess someone of their home or property?

Certainly, the administration responsible for Orphans’ Estates and the Guardianship Council acted with secure conscience when they approved purchases made in due form, honouring and accepting such deeds as valid, provided remarriage did not occur. Moreover, it was common practice for properties—including houses and land—to be securely transferred publicly, both within the city and beyond its walls, as is well known regarding certain areas on the farther bank, where such transactions frequently took place. Despite this, no one questioned whether these sales were conducted justly, nor doubted that those who purchased were the true owners of what had been sold.

Now, the King of Portugal holds rightful dominion over this city of Macau in China, precisely because there are men residing here who have married locally and committed certain offences—almost bordering on rebellion. By local laws, property may be confiscated from offenders—but by whom should such confiscation be enacted: by the King of China or by the King of Portugal? Under the Portuguese system, three ministers oversee governance: Justice, Finance, and Officials responsible for seizures. Through this authority, houses and gardens—both inside and outside the city—would be entered and taken into custody accordingly.

---

**Glossary of Terms:**

- *Madamex*: Likely a transcription error or archaic rendering; possibly intended as "mandamus" (a judicial writ) or “mandate” in the context of royal decrees. Retained phonetically with annotation due to ambiguity in original text.
- *Holy Misericórdia*: Refers to the Santa Casa da Misericórdia, a Catholic charitable brotherhood historically active in Portuguese territories, including Macau, managing social welfare, burials, and orphanages.
- *Guardianship Council / Orphans’ Estates*: Translates "Cri Gubery dos Orfãos", interpreted as administrative body overseeing minors' inheritances and guardianship, consistent with colonial legal structures.
- *Tres Ministro*: Rendered as “three ministers”, referring to key offices in the Portuguese colonial administration: Justice, Finance, and Confiscations.

This translation adheres to British English conventions and preserves the formal, legal tone of the original 19th–20th century historical document, maintaining accuracy for academic citation and scholarly analysis within UK institutional standards.

Page 26

--- TRANSLATION ---
The city, along with its surrounding areas and neighbouring settlements, contains certain land registers (taboada da tem) in which the Portuguese have long held deposits, thereby improving the land and demonstrating effective possession. Were the Mandarins inclined to intervene in this matter, it is clear that such action would not be permitted by the Ministers of the King [of Portugal]. How could it possibly be imagined that the King of Portugal might claim dominion over what did not rightfully belong to him? It is well established that the sovereignty (Soberania) of this city belongs to the King of Portugal, who has exercised dominion over it for as many years as the Portuguese have maintained possession, during which time they began paying tribute or ground rent (foro), a payment which continues to this day.

Furthermore, evidence of this sovereign authority is evident from the fact that, although Papal Bulls of the Crusade were customarily sent to other cities and territories under royal jurisdiction, they were consistently directed to this city—never to other Chinese cities, ports, or establishments within these Portuguese-controlled urban centres. The very act of granting the Cross of the Crusade signifies formal recognition of a city as belonging to the Crown, affirming its status as rightful possession, where regular tribute and annual rents are paid to the King. Indeed, this city pays an additional annual rent of five hundred taels of fine silver to the King for the land on which it stands. While the Chinese authorities may verbally disavow any formal cession of sovereignty, their actions confirm otherwise—as clearly demonstrated in numerous instances by the conduct of those governing the territory; such measures would not have been undertaken had the city not been regarded as belonging to them.

Firstly, the construction of fortifications with bastions and artillery—most notably those erected against Lantau Island—was openly carried out this year, and further defensive works were planned against Tamsui (Tompundo) in Fujian, including the deployment of artillery and naval forces under commanders dispatched from Macao, all under the explicit title of defending the city in the name of His Majesty [the King of Portugal]. Under this same authority, reinforcements were ordered, and the Governor was empowered to request military assistance if necessary.

Secondly, the assertion of territorial ownership is further evidenced by repeated petitions addressed directly to the King, made outside the usual administrative channels, requesting specific protection for the city and provision of funds for soldiers (Dindio de Soldado) to ensure its defence—actions consistent with treating the city as royal property.

I omit mention of other similar instances; instead, I pose the following question: If the Mandarins now sought to expel the Portuguese from this place, would they not commit an injustice? Or, conversely, would the Portuguese be acting unjustly in defending the city? If indeed the city belongs to the Emperor of China, and he holds rightful sovereignty over it, then his expulsion of the Portuguese would constitute no injury. Equally, however, the Portuguese would be committing a wrong if they resisted such lawful authority. Yet their continued possession, acknowledged through tribute, fortification, and royal patronage, suggests otherwise.

Page 27

--- TRANSLATION ---
There were truces made with the King of Portugal on condition that they would surrender Macao to the King of China, who was besieging it, and unjustly sought to expel them. Now then, if these and other grievances arise, who shall bear responsibility for the city and for the King of China? If the Mandarins were to notify the Portuguese that the King of China demanded satisfaction regarding Macao and ordered them to vacate the territory—then the Portuguese officials (Veadors) in office at the time—would not be able to allege that this land belonged to them. They have shown no titles by which we hold it; nor will they have any grounds to assert their right, unless perhaps they claim historical possession. Yet they cannot invoke long-standing rights without demonstrating continuous and legitimate occupation, especially when such claims must be defended. Therefore, it would be better to open negotiations, reach a settlement, and agree to terms under certain conditions rather than risk losing the settlements outright.

Moreover, the King of Portugal holds the city by multiple valid titles; yet one should not dismiss the argument that, by ordering the Portuguese to leave, the sovereign does not thereby automatically relinquish lordship over the city. For such greater assertions of authority are commonly exercised among nations in practice. Furthermore, one must not treat lightly the declarations of ordinary Mandarins, who maintain that this territory belongs to the King of China and that he may eject the Portuguese from it whenever he pleases. This is because not all understand the precise tenets concerning the status of the city, nor is every pronouncement binding; yet the Kings are obliged to uphold justice. We act accordingly. And herein lies a common understanding: if the Portuguese commit acts of force or aggression, the King of China could easily expel them, given his power and the proximity of his forces.

Indeed, this serves to instil caution among the Portuguese, keeping them apprehensive, compliant, and fearful. But is this merely fear? For when matters of state arise, agreements are reached—yet these agreements are not always adhered to in good faith.

Third Point. Concerning the Mayor and the City.
When the Mandarins of Canton demand that the Portuguese evacuate this territory, arguing that the city is theirs and that they are bound by certain conditions of conduct, one such condition has been that tribute in silver be paid anew—particularly from the Company, from whom this is expected.

Page 28

--- TRANSLATED TEXT ---
This city is built and inhabited, and the papay [a local term for tax or tribute] remains due. It was signed by the former governors and by the council appointed by the authorities for this matter. There were five practices carried out by the Portuguese in this city which greatly scandalised the Mandarins.

The first was the enslavement of Chinese people—buying them and selling them abroad—and doing so openly, to such an extent that on one occasion a ship departed from this city, another vessel commanded by Bueno being similarly laden with Merinos [possibly a transcription error; context suggests enslaved men or boys] and young girls.

The second practice involved sheltering Japanese individuals. Although these Japanese did not come to the city of their own free will, some few had been driven here by two ships wrecked along the coast near Macau, who, having incurred the hostility of the Chinese and fearing for their lives, had no choice but to seek refuge among the Portuguese for protection. Yet, once safe, they dismantled their vessels in order to return to Japan. Nevertheless, since the Chinese knew these Japanese to be noble-born enemies, they resented finding them harboured within this city, moving about freely and armed, without the city having formally requested permission from the provincial authorities (Mad. likely abbreviates *Mandarin* or *Magistracy*).

The third cause for offence was the purchase of stolen goods as if they were lawfully acquired, which I have often seen brought in under torchlight at night.

The fourth was the construction of new houses in São Novo. Through this, the city was expanding considerably. The more it expanded, the more it appeared to the Chinese as though enemies were encroaching upon their realm; such growth seemed deeply threatening, especially given that the Portuguese elevated even common merchants to the status of knighted gentlemen—a social transformation incomprehensible and alarming to Chinese sensibilities.

The fifth issue was the arrival of armed galleons under the pretence of escorting trading ships, yet without paying customs duties to the Emperor, departing from here fully laden just like the merchant junks themselves.

These matters caused great scandal among the Mandarins, and there were indeed calls to expel the Portuguese. For by nature they could not tolerate—especially when trade advantages were already granted to foreign agents—that such extensive commercial activity should take place within their empire, where no other nation enjoyed so lucrative a trade arrangement anywhere in the world.

Yet the Mandarins refrained from expelling the Portuguese, having judged that their presence had become so long-established and so deeply entrenched over so many years that they might be tolerated, provided only that they ceased the aforementioned activities. Nor was it merely the promise of good conduct regarding restraint that stayed their hand, but also the Chinese fear of war—which is such that...

Page 29

--- TRANSLATION ---
[ILLEGIBLE: ~15 characters] will proceed via the ship *São Perão*. As for the particular telegraph, it is to be established in the city of *Nao*, although no new houses are to be built there, given that the city of *Naa* intends to expand. Instead, construction will take place on Ilha Verde (Green Island); indeed, this is a matter worthy of note, since it is well known and publicly acknowledged that the Mandarins prohibit the building of new houses in new locations. Yet on this island, buildings are being erected precisely on the same sites where older structures stood for many years—this would seem to indicate that, in the development of the island, the city’s earlier promises to the Mandarins are being broken. Should such a breach occur, the Mandarins would have just cause to formally protest; however, they have never objected to anything beyond the construction of multi-storey dwellings (*casas de sobrado*), evidently because they do not wish for low-rise buildings, as even today all who desire them continue to build in this elevated style.

If such constructions are not justified on grounds of habitation, they may instead serve as fortifications. It caused great astonishment among the Mandarins when the Mandarin of Aniab took it upon himself to accuse and order the demolition of certain houses. From him, much harm could be expected; he might extend his actions to all nearby settlements, and even to Aniab itself. In this regard, proceedings were carried out with pikes and *movia* (a local term possibly referring to militia or armed retainers), as later confessed by the *Conchefa* in Paris after hostilities had ceased, stating that the uprising had arisen from great resentment but without solid foundation.

In this light, we were content to relocate the city elsewhere, knowing full well that when the Chinese discovered our houses, they sought to seize them and expel us, revealing themselves at that moment as possessed of a treacherous disposition. We have never managed to fully secure the rights and claims held by so many residents of the same city thus far advanced, especially since the Portuguese and those aligned with us have shown, demonstrated, and even pointed out to the Chinese—wherever permitted—that they should not obstruct us. Henceforth, on the island, we shall speak neither through intermediaries nor within the confines of multi-storey houses; rather, once the land is secured, we shall assert our position openly. By refusing to comply, we demonstrate clearly that we will not submit to their demands. Indeed, as he desired, not a single word shall be spoken on the island under duress.

It must be clearly understood that our stance here is one of firm resolve and good faith. If, therefore, the Mandarin chooses to show contempt—particularly from the side of Haitas—and proceeds with enforcement solely against the smaller houses, claiming they constitute fortresses, then once these are demolished, we shall no longer remain as before. We warn them plainly: if they do not wish to coexist peacefully, let them declare it openly, for we too have resolved to stand firm for the island, supported by numerous legitimate claims, and we shall demonstrate, when the time comes, the full extent of our rights—especially in the courts of Paris.

Page 30

--- TRANSLATION ---
Fourth Point or Chapter. The fourth chapter is one of protest. It states as follows: “We support and uphold this territory under our governance. It is not ours, but belongs to the Emperor of China; we hereby declare and formally protest that, in accordance with what has been seen and established, we shall govern ourselves, disposing of matters concerning faith and the observance of religious practices. With regard to the Green Island (Ilha Verde), and the Rector residing within the Company’s establishment thereafter, no harm or disturbance shall be inflicted upon this City, its inhabitants, or the merchants who attend the fairs at Canton—both presently and in the future—as well as those which may be held further along the river. This commerce is of such importance, having been so frequently commended and placed under protection by His Majesty, through successive monarchs, given the great benefit and utility derived therefrom for the entire State of India and for the Kingdom of Portugal. And they immediately reiterate this protest—once and whenever possible—requiring the Company to render a full account whenever necessary, regarding any matter affecting this City or the preservation of trade.”

The first principle asserted on this point reflects the sentiment that duty and authority reside with those who have governed, possessing inherent rights and attributes, and that these authorities should belong to the City itself. Governance should proceed according to their capacity, observing the cross (i.e., Christian principles), and confirmed through authentic ecclesiastical and legal declarations. They are not lords of the City, nor is the King of Portugal its sovereign lord, whose representative holds only delegated authority. On this same principle, it was deemed appropriate to advance such arguments in formal pleadings, grounded in reasoned submissions, and refusal to appear or be properly received in higher tribunals would result in prejudice to the secondary Crown. If the City is not theirs, nor belonging to the Emperor of China, then they shall not interfere in the affairs of Green Island, acting instead as ministers of the Emperor of China and executors of his mandates. Nevertheless, they may assert that, as conservators of commerce, the City must remain in the form and condition in which it currently stands.

Page 31

--- TRANSLATION ---
The Mandarins (Mores) would come to us whenever they had any matter to raise with the Company, and to them we responded and with them we maintained relations. On those occasions when the city authorities were involved, matters invariably proceeded to São Paulo. This year, if the Portuguese in Canton act on behalf of Aubrey and present themselves as agents of the Mandarins, yet the Fathers immediately put an end to Moro’s involvement—we acceded to their request only out of obligation, given that we had previously granted certain privileges to some Chinese in Canton. They showed clear intent to expel the Portuguese, declaring that they would take decisive action and prohibit trade; indeed, the houses on the island were already completed when they entered Noyerigo without the customary security from the Astao, as was their usual practice for those who accompanied them, thereby enabling them to employ other measures should they wish to extricate themselves. However, the Company deferred its formal protest and severed ties outright, as is well known through public edification, acting in the interest of peace and because there was no party willing to contest the situation—our goods and merchandise remained detained precisely on our account, and should the galleons bound for India be delayed, we may yet see whether the Portuguese will align themselves with our understanding. Yet, seeking alternative means that might arise, we aim to avoid the provocations which the Portuguese inflicted upon the Mandarins in Canton.

It must not be inferred from here that the Company advises waging war against the Chinese—a false accusation raised by the Company, or indicative of ill will. Other measures exist, and it is such alternatives that the Company recommends, so that the Portuguese may live in peace there: namely, acknowledging the Chinese as rightful masters of the land, as indeed they are. And if among ourselves—citizens of this settlement—there exists any difference of opinion or divergence of view, it concerns only the methods to be employed for our preservation. We judge these methods ought to consist in strict adherence to the established conditions, particularly refraining from detaining Chinese subjects, and avoiding any provocation towards Japan; neither purchasing smuggled cloth from officials, nor withholding payments due to the Emperor of China. The Portuguese gentlemen (*mosiors*) in Macao must cease mistreating the Chinese, engaging in robbery and violence, even extending to the households of the Mandarins; and perhaps, as experienced observers note and as the Chinese themselves assert, it is precisely such conduct that may lead to their expulsion from Canton.

Page 32

--- TRANSLATION ---
without the orders of the senior Mandarins, either to obtain bribes or to humiliate and belittle the Portuguese; if he were opposed to it, the Tizolucas should not proceed, nor would he be allowed to carry it out. And regarding the Tizolucas in general, reverence must be shown towards the Mandarins; however, unusual or unauthorized initiatives must not be tolerated, nor excessive deference displayed. As for the matter of the powerful radio operator, the Company will learn from previous instances, when Sjõnde makes demands with authority. Year 1622. Letter from Fr. Nicolao Longobardo to Fr. Visitor Gabriel de Mattos. Pax Christi, together with almonada from Lord Trigau of Canton. I have received on the fourth, along with four letters from D.R., the favour which for so many years I had requested—relief from this burden so disproportionate to my strength: for all this, I render many thanks to D.R., though with affection and sorrow at undertaking what D.R. most desires, for His greater glory.

Page 33

--- TRANSLATION ---
The 16th of the Visitation, when Mr. I. M. was still present. Now, however, Mr. Garces Feijó will proceed there, as directed by the same Father, having requested to arrive no later than the end of June: upon his arrival, I shall immediately hand over to him the *Extente* of the Lord and the principal documents of the Mission. As for the matters raised in Mahavema’s letters, much could be said in response. But since this falls within the duties of the Father successor, he will address them in due course after his arrival.

On my part, I shall only propose three or four points, which Your Reverence well knows.

Firstly, regarding the use of silk and whether all the Fathers were supplied with *passeurs* (silk garments), and whether each was present—this being based on a statement made by our Father, who stated that Father Orgão had received instructions from Father Assistant D. Nuno Mascarenhas. Hence, not only was there no occasion for any forced application of equity (*epiqueia*), but it was even considered appropriate to please all Superiors; yet now, by order, its continuation has been suspended at the direction of the Magistrates—sometimes it was allowed to continue, sometimes discontinued—the said practice thus left in uncertainty.

Secondly, concerning the journal of Father Fernandes, and why I wrote nothing about this matter to the Father Visitor while I remained here: this was entirely due to orders still awaiting verification of the notes I had recorded. At that time, purchases of silk were being made, and therefore I entrusted the matter to Father Orgão, instructing him, according to what he observed during the course of his duties, to report later to the Father Visitor. When accused of involvement in the silk affair through this journal, it was not among the more serious faults committed; others have committed far greater transgressions in this Mission. But this time, he allowed himself to be deceived in such a disgraceful and wretched manner. May God forgive him, and grant him grace to amend, for the time is one of lamentation.

As he was to be dismissed from the Society, it seemed more advisable that this take place in India or some other distant location removed from China—partly to remove the immediate cause of scandal, partly to eliminate the opportunity of serving the Trade interests, and he chose not to enter into this matter further.

Thirdly, it seemed unusual here that I should have been assisted by Father Orgão in governance. On this point, little need be said: though perhaps something ought to be said, and justifiably so, given the circumstances, since Father

Page 34

--- TRANSLATION ---
The Superior has a particular concern in this matter. The fourth point is that it would be advisable to relieve Father Fraya of the office of Procurator, so that he may apply himself more fully to the condition of the lower clergy. I say that this resolution appears very good to all of us here, especially to Father d’Azevedo, who is awaiting the arrival of the new Superior at this residence in order to hand over the said office immediately. Furthermore—and although this should only be considered seriously after the arrival of the new Superior—it was also suggested by B that Father Fraya should be promptly instructed to arrange matters suitably and then depart, so that in any case this might soon be carried into effect. This was written in reply on 17th August 1782.

The progress at Michas is the same as previously reported regarding the activities of Fathers Frayas at Canton, and indeed much improved by that divine goodness which enables various Mandarins to approach our Fathers. Would that we had many more here, and that these were already proficient in this language—we could then fill all fifteen provinces of China with the Gospel. The Colao of Alcunda Ye (now the chief among the Colaos in Xiamen) is very active in supporting our affairs, and has on several occasions delivered strong rebukes to Xin, our adversary, urging him to return to obedience; yet he always remains obstinate—perhaps because you did not bear the cross. But ultimately it matters little to us, for I see that he is now on our side, as are many others of his rank, and we have received due satisfaction from him. To God’s Divine Majesty be all praise, who deigns thus to protect us.

We respectfully urge Dr. Cabo of Xiamen, most earnestly. We inform you on 22 March 1787 of certain complaints concerning Macao; precisely because of this, there is danger that serious displeasure from high-ranking Mandarins may arise against it, and likewise a significant portion of the harm redounds upon this Christian community. The first complaint concerns the *cafus* [servants or attendants] and ill-behaved servants of the Portuguese, who treat the Chinese poorly and cause grave disorder; their conduct provokes great resentment among the native population. The second concerns Portuguese officials who name their dogs after northern tribes such as Tutes and Capan, 8th Division, and call out to their dogs using these names. Such behaviour deeply offends all the Mandarins.

Page 35

--- TRANSLATION ---
17. The two envoys sent by the Portuguese, and because they were Viceroys, were somewhat aloof from the other people, with various matters of this nature. These particulars I am now writing to Your Reverend Excellency at the insistence of Doctor Cabral, so that our Portuguese may receive greater consideration in Chah and be treated more favourably by the Chinese authorities, given that the Mandarins in these regions—both in Canton and at the Court in Macao—have spoken thus: “Let Catao deliver this to Mr. Parcaval and Mendes,” and all of them are very resentful towards those from Malacca, fearing that one day they might rise up against the Kingdom. Although I suspect there may not be much foundation for these complaints, especially as the Chinese are themselves greatly feared and powerful, it is nonetheless prudent to be informed of what transpires there, so that shortcomings, oversights, and errors may be corrected.

Your Reverend Excellency should also know that I reported to the other Chief Eunuch about the grievance committed by the Mandarins of Canton against our people—specifically, their ordering the demolition of houses, the destruction of Ilha Verde (Green Island), and Magalhães’ erection of that infamous stone monument, which was an affront to the honour of the Portuguese. Whereupon I requested that he intervene with Futub, the newly appointed Thefeito and Collegiate Official of Consular rank, in favour of Macao, so that he might ensure fair treatment for the Portuguese by the Emperor and the highest levels of the Chinese administration, showing liberal goodwill and authority over the Kingdom of China, offering gratis several pieces of artillery as a gesture of goodwill.

The Chief Eunuch has already dispatched his conciliatory letter, which has been sent forward without delay; furthermore, I have now directed Senior Paul (Sén Paulo) to ensure that justice is done before the Mundane Futub regarding the petitions which Your Reverend Excellency, together with the Overseers of Macao, may wish to send, seeking the restitution of the Ilha Verde and permission to rebuild their houses anew.

In sum, these matters should be discussed in consultation with Lord Dornavés, given his esteemed position and the importance and necessity thereof. Our Fathers and officials of that College could then, under such favourable circumstances, firmly establish their presence in Macao as previously desired, and be further strengthened through support from Manhém (Manila), along with other supplies and resources from within China, which would thereafter become more readily accessible and abundant.

It should be noted in connection with this favour from Futub that Hastaos and Cheguen Afforá, who arrived there recently, are close personal friends of Doctor Miguel, who, had he remained here, would have been of great assistance concerning affairs relating to Macao.

Page 36

--- TRANSLATION ---
Merits from China. It is now time to pursue the ten petitions addressed to the Mandarins of Canton, forwarding our requests to the three Tribunals of Tá Bó Chayuen and Atías, as best advised by Father São Paulo together with Estiam and Miguel, along with Father Afonso D’Ankons. Nothing further presents itself at present; thus, I conclude, commending all to the Holy Sacrifices and the intercession of Dr. Many, who greatly encouraged me. Macao, 25 April 1622.
Servant in Christ,
N.R. Nicolaus Congobardo.

I must not fail to inform Dr. [name unspecified] that it seems he ought to have placed in the care of the Companions the documents intended for submission—those posts (positions) which were later to produce their intended effect. Father Afonso D’Ankons imagined we had already been formally authorised by order of the King. Yet, upon learning from our adversary that there had been discouragement among the unfavourable members of the Company—as indeed is evident—the dissimulation under which we currently operate has become apparent. Throughout my life, I would never have undone what D’Ankons has undertaken against those with whom he holds a particular grievance, especially as Doctor Miguel clearly states: both he and the leading Christians, well informed throughout, continually advised me accordingly. And insofar as lies within my power, let there be no talk of entering into hostile actions. Have patience, if you truly desire the good of our Mission—as indeed I am certain you do—and meanwhile send assistance from there, particularly through efforts directed against D’Ankons and other matters which may prove beneficial to this Christian enterprise.

Our Lord.
Idem, Nicolaus.

Concerning the city of Macao—and its Suppo, or rather the residents there—it will always remain subject to great oppression from the Chinese and their governors and Mandarins, acting under the authority of the First Emperor of China. A brief distance from Green Island (Ilha Verde), where the Portuguese had decommissioned forces, they will seize control again in due course.

Page 37

--- TRANSLATED TEXT ---
For 58 years without holding any legitimate title, and during this time having expended a considerable sum of money from that City, with residents—both those dwelling there and others from the Province of India—paying dues in order to counteract the influence exerted by the Chinese authorities at the fairs, the Fathers [Nestorian priests] were compelled to relinquish their holdings in Alha, yet they never wished nor agreed to surrender anything further. Likewise, within the New City, houses and tall buildings had been constructed, involving significant expenditure on major porticos and grand façades. The King of China, through his Governors or Mandarins, who had been present the previous year aboard Portuguese vessels near the coast, observed these developments and perceived them as an encroachment; thus, he began preparing strong residences and defensive works, and the Chinese erected fortifications resembling concealed castles for purposes of defence. Consequently, in this month of May 1720, hostilities broke out on land, whereby all the Meridieny [possibly a transcription error for ‘mercenaries’ or ‘military forces’] of India advanced with all their equipment, remaining for a prolonged period until they lost their stronghold and were unable to retain control over India.

In the said year, it became evident that this position would indeed be lost—as is well known—resulting in substantial losses and damage to the inhabitants of this Estado [State], particularly affecting the Almandezas Vacy [unclear proper noun, possibly a place or office]. The principal cause of this downfall was the seizure of power and growing dominance exercised by the ninth [likely referring to a faction or official rank] within this Ptha [possibly ‘pitha’ or local term for district/administrative unit], along with their considerable authority, without rendering account to anyone, causing grave prejudice not only to eminent officials such as Girao and other native leaders, but also refusing ever to obey any command or comply with formal requisitions, including those issued by the Secretariat of the Chamber. Both residents and ecclesiastical figures alike suffered under these conditions.

Accordingly, the Ministers of that City were compelled, in view of these serious grievances and to avert the danger threatening the entire region—given the magnitude of potential harm—to cede Alha to the Mandarins of the King of China. They agreed to demolish all structures within Alha, including those recently built, and formally relinquished all rights thereto, so that the aforementioned merchants, military personnel, and petitioners might remain satisfied under the administration of the said Chinese Governors. However, the Fathers of the Company [i.e., the Jesuit Order] remained discontented regarding this matter, lodging numerous protests and formal complaints with the municipal authorities of that City, issuing threats against its officials and residents through ecclesiastical penalties, censures, and excommunications under Apostolic privileges, as well as imposing additional spiritual sanctions, thereby creating widespread fear and unrest.

Therefore, Your Most Excellent Majesty, having been duly informed of these events, is hereby humbly requested to be graciously pleased to issue instructions and revoke the privileges previously granted, such that the Fathers of the Company shall no longer be permitted—neither directly nor through intermediaries—to reside within the Green Alha, nor to construct any building therein, however minor, without prior authorisation from the Chinese Governors. Should they act contrarily, they shall be subject to the lawful justice and enforcement measures of Your Most Excellent Majesty.

Page 38

--- TRANSLATION INTO MODERN UK ACADEMIC ENGLISH ---

[ILLEGIBLE: ~15 characters] concerning the secular authorities, and the members of the Society [of Jesus] were assisting in this matter; proceedings were accordingly initiated against all those who criminally opposed the Church and infringed its rights, with sentences pronounced by this Court. Such penalties were to be enforced through ecclesiastical agents. However, no Ombudsman (Ouvidor), nor any secular magistrate, was formally protested against, nor was any official complaint lodged regarding this matter, under penalty of 100 patacas to be paid towards the costs of justice, depending on the discharge of these offices, &c. &c.

It is hereby ordered that the Fathers of the Company [Society] of Jesus in China shall introduce no innovations, nor make alterations to Our property on Green Island (Ilha Verde), nor undertake any construction whatsoever beyond what was already in place during the preceding year, when the Chinese inhabitants became discontented and converted, desiring to act contrary to the decisions of the Secular Justices. In such cases, the civil authorities—having received full support from the Justice of the capital city—shall take action against any individuals engaged in works carried out in contravention of this order.

Dated 13th April 1622.
Governor Barretto Simão Cunha.

Copy of the Provision.
[Cipher or seal illegible]

From Albuquerque, member of His Majesty’s Council, Captain-Major and Governor of India, &c.: I hereby notify all whom it may concern, having examined the petition submitted by the city of Macao, referenced above and written on another folio, together with the arguments presented therein, and conforming myself with the appearance of the judicial report and dispatch, I have determined that the Fathers of the Society of Jesus in China shall introduce no innovations, nor alter in any way Our property on Green Island, but shall maintain it in the condition existing during the previous year, when the Chinese inhabitants raised objections and conversions occurred. Should they attempt actions contrary to the rulings of the Secular Justices, the civil authorities—fully supported by the Justice of the capital city—shall proceed against any persons working on constructions undertaken in violation of this order.

Page 39

--- TRANSLATED TEXT ---
To the Justices and Officials, to whom it may concern: Let it be known that you are hereby commanded to ensure the full execution and observance of this Alvará (royal warrant) in accordance with its contents, without delay or obstruction. This instrument shall hold the same authority as a papal bull issued in the name of His Highness, notwithstanding any provisions to the contrary contained in Book 2, Title 4 of the Ordenações. João de Souza issued this at Pangim on 18 April 1622. The Secretary António Rodrigues de Gomara caused it to be written.

The Governor’s Alvará, by Divine Majesty’s command, required the reaffirmation of Macau’s loyalty, following consultation with the Judges of the Revenue Court and the chief officer of the China Company, stipulating that no innovations or alterations should be introduced regarding the Shatonde [possibly *Xiatang* or another toponym; retained as in original] revenue stream. Rather, matters were to remain in the same state as they stood in 1617, as previously established above, under the authority of D. Sover and all due oversight.

Recorded by Afonso Rodrigues da Juvara in Volume 5 of the General Registers, folio 79, page 60. Ej. João de Souza Doy milita — To the Officials: Three thousand five hundred Teix. Manuel de Azavedo. Consalo Pinto Defonseca.

Registered in the Chancelaria (Chancery), Volume 4, folio 234. Matheus Rangel.

I certify, I, D. Caldo de Rego, Deputy President of the Chamber Records of this City of the Name of God (Nome de Deus), that the transcript extracted from folio 41 of the Chamber Books of this city corresponds exactly to the original document cited above, and that it faithfully reproduces the *verbum* ("the wording") of the petition presented. In the name of this City, I have issued this certification based on my official appointment, the preceding day to the date of the petition, copies of which remain in the archives of the Notaries’ offices of this City.

And since this duty was incumbent upon me, I have carried it out and hereby affix my signature. Done this 20th day of September 1623.

Anny Diego Caldo de Rego, C.D.F.

Fune Cardom, Frey Duvidor, holding the jurisdiction of Judge of Justifications for His Highness in this City of the Name of Don Daftina XII.

Let it be known to all who shall receive this certificate of justification in matters of legal record: accept it as authentic and duly recognised.

Page 40

--- TRANSLATION ---
The seizure by His Majesty’s authority of the Green Island, and the fiscal report from Dona Catarina de Brugo, presented by Ma Carnara of this City, as confirmed to me under oath by the escriuano [notary or scribe] who subscribes this document, on the basis of which I have rendered my final decision as justified, and certified according to the possession she has demonstrated, attested by myself in writing and sealed with the Royal Seals of the Crown of Portugal. This judgment was delivered in the Court of the Ouvidor of this City.
On this date, the twentieth day of the month of October in the year 1623.
Ca Afonso Graces Carnar, of the Ouvidoria, caused this to be written and countersigned.

D. Nada e de Aponav, four réis.
Francisco Cardim Tróis.
Valle without seal—ex causa.

Cardim, petition and complaints submitted by Mr. António Feite of the Company of JESUS, Provincial of this College of Macau, requesting a certified copy and formal record of the instrument drawn up by Dias.
Mr. Francisco Cardim Tróis, of the Aluada, and Judge of Justifications by order of His Majesty.

Page 41

--- TRANSLATION ---
Dated in the form of a testimonial letter, concerning the offices of his petition, together with the dispatch thereupon issued and the minutes of proceedings conducted before the Chamber, which had been presented, and the due completion thereof being rightful and proper as belonging to the matter, I hereby declare that, by written petition addressed to me, Father António Xeite of the Company of JESUS, Procurator of this College of Macau, has made known that, for the benefit of the said College, certified copies of the proceedings (Treslados dos Afrentes) and their justifications are necessary; and he requests that these be issued under testimonial letter through official channels, affirming that he shall duly receive them, upon which the said dispatch shall serve as sufficient warrant, as requested. Macao, 7th September, Sixteen Hundred and Twenty-Seven.

Endorsed at the beginning of the first Act, sealed, dispatched, and attested in full—each word rendered verbatim. See the following:

Certified Copy of the First Act.

In the Year of the Birth of Our Lord God, One Thousand Six Hundred and Twenty-Seven years, on this seventh day of the month of September of the said year, in this City of the Name of God in China: In the presence of the undersigned Notary Public, appeared Don António Xeite of the Company of JESUS, Procurator of this College of Macau, who submitted to me his petition, accompanied by a dispatch issued thereon by Don Francisco Cardim Troi, Oidor (Judge of the Royal Audience), duly authorised by His Majesty’s authority in this said city, together with the minutes of proceedings (afrentes) drawn up before the Chamber. He petitioned that the said dispatch be executed and fulfilled, in order that justice be served regarding the contents of this petition and the matters raised therein. I, Afonso Graces Gierivas, Notary Public and Keeper of Public Records, by authority of His Majesty, have here recorded this act during the course of the said petition and proceedings.

Certified Copy of the Petition.

Don António Xeite of the Company of JESUS, Procurator of the College of Macau, petitions the Most Excellent Lord Governor, requesting that, for the good of the said College, certified copies (treslados) of the proceedings and their justifications be granted to him. He further requests that these be delivered under official testimonial letter via proper channel, affirming that he shall receive them accordingly, and that the present dispatch shall serve as binding authorisation, as formally requested.

Page 42

No translation available for this page.

Page 43

--- TRANSLATION ---
21 October, or so it shall be recorded. Nuno de Mello Cabral, Alferes (ensign) and clerk of the Câmara (municipal council), hereby certifies: Nuno de Mello; António Coelho Rebelo; Diogo Fernandes de Carvalho; Gonçalo de Albuquerque; Rodrigo Sanches de Paredes; Coutinho de Gusmão Velho; Gonçalo Fernandes Correia; António da Oliveira Ananha; Heitor da Gama e Mota Caldeira; Francisco Carvalho de Conto; Salvador Pinto de Negreiros; Rafael Carneiro de Sousa; José Carneiro; Domingos Cardoso Soares; Constantino de Castro Mattos; Francisco Boleto; Francisco Rodrigues da Silva; Manuel da Cruz; Manuel de Morais Pimenta; Francisco da Cunha Chalazar; António Javan Gondim; Pedro Rodrigues Ferreira; Dionísio Vaz; João Pinto de Figueireda; Comado Ferreira; Tristão Carreiras; António Alfredo da Costa; António de Serral; João Aranha Pedrosa; João como Rodrigues de Siza; António Lopes Cardoso; Pedro Corvelha Carvalho; Pedro Dias da Carvalho; Pedro Paulo da Lorga; Sebastião Rebelo; Pedro Jacy; Francisco Soares de Brito; Vicomte de Sousa de Cima; Fernando da Costa Homem; António Cortez; Fernando Danice de Morales; Simão Vaz; Domingos Carvalho; Francisco Mendes Mourão; Domingos Paes da Cogan; Diogo Lázaro Bueno; João de Paiva Pereira; Francisco Monteiro Homem; António Vobo Pedrosa; Alacer Guetar.

This record was drawn up by me, Nuno de Mello Cabral, Alferes and Clerk of the Câmara of this City of Nome de Deus in China, faithfully transcribed from the book of extraordinários (extraordinary appointments or levies) of 1784, from which year the said names were exported to Macao, and subsequently came into force in the month of May. Finalised on the eleventh day of October in the year one thousand seven hundred and twenty-one. Done in the Câmara chamber, under my hand.
Nuno de Mello Cabral.

Copy of the Justification. To Dom Francisco Cardim Tous Duende, Alcaide and Keeper of the Records of Justifications by order of His Majesty, in this City of Nome de Deus in China: we present herewith the original document concerning the term (record) of Nuno de Mello Cabral, Alferes and Clerk of the Câmara of this City, currently serving in his post, as attested by the sworn statement of the Scrivener (notary or scribe).

---

**Notes for Academic Use:**

- *Câmara*: Retained with explanation as "municipal council", a standard Portuguese colonial administrative body.
- *Alferes*: Translated as "ensign", a military rank equivalent to a junior officer; retained in original form where appropriate with translation provided.
- *Nome de Deus em China*: Preserved as "City of Nome de Deus in China" — a historical designation referring to a Portuguese ecclesiastical or administrative settlement, likely in the Macao region or associated missionary context.
- *Extraordinários*: Translated as "extraordinary appointments or levies", indicating exceptional fiscal or military conscriptions, common in Portuguese colonial administration.
- Names have been standardised using modern Portuguese orthography while preserving historical accuracy.
- Dates follow British format (day-month-year) and use traditional ordinal forms consistent with academic conventions.
- Terms such as *Alcaide* (translated as "keeper" or "magistrate") and *escrivão* ("scrivener" or "clerk") are rendered in period-appropriate English equivalents suitable for scholarly analysis.

This translation is suitable for inclusion in academic publications, archival research, and historical studies relating to Portuguese colonial administration in Asia during the early 18th century.

Page 44

--- TRANSLATION ---
which was observed through the Theodolite, and finally confirmed as justified. By courtesy thereof, the present document is issued, signed by me and sealed with the seal of the Arms 'Teaci of the Crown of Portugal'. In the Office of the Ombudsman (Ouvidoria) of this said City it is recorded. On the eleventh day of the Month of October in the year one hundred and twenty-one. Dictated by Afonso Spacces Obrerav, Clerk of the Ouvidoria, who caused it to be written, transcribed, and entered. P. siada, and dell Asunar 4. Francisco Cardim Trois — Valla, without seal, due to cause, [note:] Cardim.

Copy of a Petition.
To Father António Cieza of the Company of Jesus (Comp. de I.O.M.I.), Procurator of this College of Macao of the said Company, who, for the benefit of the said College, requires a certified copy of an Act passed in this Chamber. In the year one hundred and twenty-one, wherein it was resolved that it would be in the interest of the welfare of this City that Your Lordship’s Magistracy (V. Mag.ª) should intervene; and that the India-bound galleys should not depart from this port that year, given that news had arrived via Japan advising that Dutch enemy forces were advancing upon this City, and that they might indeed attack when least expected; wherefore he petitions Your Supreme Magistracy (V.S.M.) to order the issuance of said certified copy through the proper municipal authorities (C.A.M.).

Copy of the Dispatch.
Ordered: that the copy be issued of such matters as are on record.

In Macao, on the twentieth day of August in the year one hundred and twenty-three. Rebello.

Copy of the Second Act.
Copy of the record as formally drawn up.
On the 4th.

Page 45

--- TRANSLATED TEXT ---
Extraordinary Session. On the ninth day of the month of November in the present year of sixteen hundred and twenty, in the Council Chamber of this City of Nome de Deus in China, the Judge, Aldermen, together with the Captain-Major of Japan (commander of the carracks), the Venerable Doctor Lourenço Roberto Buardor, representative of His Majesty, the Right Reverend Bishop of Japan, & Fr. António do Rosário, Governor of this Brigade of China, and Prelates of the Religious Orders), and representatives of the Cities) convened solely to deliberate upon the governance of said city. It was discussed and formally confirmed by notarial record that news had arrived concerning the Dutch and English, who were reported to be preparing to sail against this City with intent to attack, thereby threatening the safe conduct of correspondence—both from the Factor in Japan and from the religious superiors—and endangering other communications. Given the urgency, it was considered necessary whether the ships of India, along with their personnel, should remain on land, under the command of the elders of Shirsa, or stay; yet omission of such measures was observed. Since the security of this City is of utmost importance to the state of the Faith, and given that the aforesaid enemy forces—Dutch and English—are now so near, all the said citizens unanimously agreed (without any dissent) that, for many just and weighty reasons relating to the service of God and of His Majesty, as well as the preservation of maritime routes in the African seas, the agents and ships from India ought to remain in this territory, and none should depart.

This view was expressed and concluded in accordance with the manner and considerations set forth by the aforementioned officials. The Captain-Major stated his opinion that the agent should remain, along with the ships, which were then preparing to sail, together with their officers, captains, and merchants, including Dilly. Upon hearing this, Your Lordship was sufficiently persuaded by the opinion expressed by the said Captain-Major. Nevertheless, despite his reservations, having regard to the pressing necessity and gravity of the situation, he acknowledged that the ships would be compelled to remain, bound by obligation to the City and to the common good, especially where their presence was most needed. Furthermore, he declared himself in conformity with the directives of the Reverend Father Provincial of Japan, the Father Governor, and the other Prelates, who also affirmed and supported the decision that all the ships and agents should remain.

Likewise, the said Captain-Major explicitly declared that he undertook full responsibility for this resolution, and requested that, should any difficulty arise at any time due to the retention of these ships, it be attributed to him, given the critical importance of this matter.

Page 46

--- TRANSLATION ---
signed before Acclacas, and awaiting the India ships at the Straits. I myself wrote: "António del Mello Cabral", "Gonçalo Sarmiento", "Diogo Bispo de Yapai", "Fr. António do Rosário", "Fr. Simas de S. António", "Fr. António de Benavidez", "António Gomes Ribeiro", "Gabriel de Mallet", "Fr. António de S. Jorge", "Agostinho", "Pedro Correa Carneira", "António Galvão", "Gonçalves", "Garcia Borges de Ceguina", "Vicente de Siz Velho", "Jacome Rodrigues de Ferda", "Thome Dias", "Affonso Piz", "António Ferreira", "Manoel Coelho de Morinã", "José Pinho de Freitas", "José Cardoso", "António Francisco", "Francisco Carvalho", "G. Ellenh." de Carvalho", "Franc. Rodrigues da Silva", "Esterão Borges", "Francisco Soares de Britte", "Baltazar Teixeira", "Alfonso Aliz", "Francisco Boltheu", "Baltazar de Salazar", "Aécio de Malta Caldi", "Calvador Marinho", "Andre Dias", "Fr. de Chaujo de Barros", "Pedro Paulo da Veiga", "Diogo Vaz Baratas", "Geronimo Ferreira Marinho", "Antonio da Costa", "Affonso Graciaz", "Francisco Freire", "Manoel de Moraes Fomenta", "Francisco Paz da Costa", "Pedro Ferreira de Amaral", "Esterão Piz", "Manoel Aliz", "Jorge Serqueira", "Antonio Tias" Ferreira", "Giraldo da Rocha", "Pedro Fernandes de Carvalho", "Diogo Caldi" de Rego, alferez, and curates of the Chamber of this City: from the name of God of China, he caused it to be transcribed and abbreviated on the thirty-first day of August in the year sixteen hundred and twenty-three. Agreed with the ordinary judge, “Diogo Caldi” de Rego, and Simas Vaz de Paiva. Translated from the Justification. The Lord

Page 47

--- TRANSLATION ---
23rd. This Ordinary Judge hereby certifies, as far as I have been informed under oath by the Child who has observed it, in accordance with the said letters, and further justified by authenticated testimony, confirmed with certainty through an equivalent affidavit sworn before me, affirmed under the seal of the Royal Arms of the Crown of Portugal, and recorded in the Court of Oyer and Terminer of this City on the seventh day of the month of September in the year one thousand eight hundred and twenty-three.

I, Afonso Graces, Children’s Officer of the Oyer Court, caused this to be written and subscribed: E. Nada, four times witnessed. Francisco Cardim, Christ. Della, without seal, *ex causa* — Cardim.

This instrument, drawn up in the form of a testimonial letter, together with the aforesaid petition, decree, and justificatory minutes—all transcribed herein—has been copied onto three sheets of Japanese paper; this present sheet being the first of the three, without addition or omission of any matter whatsoever, nor any doubt arising from marginalia or interlinear insertions. It is duly conveyed through the Offices, adjusted according to agreement, and proceeds for greater authentication, affirmed under the seal of the Royal Arms of the Crown of Portugal, and filed in the Court of Oyer and Terminer of this City.

On this twentieth day of the month of September in the year one thousand eight hundred and twenty-three.

I, Afonso Graces, Children’s Officer of the Oyer Court, hereby offer this transcription and subscribe: P. Nada. Four times witnessed. And transmitted by way—this being the second copy. Francisco Cardim, Trois Della, without seal, *ex causa* Cardim—agreed and finalised by our Officers here, duly adjusted.

Page 48

--- ORIGINAL TEXT ---

**Section 1: Financial Summary (Top Section)**
* **Line 1:** *Até o anno de 1622 fezinha gasto na Ilha em amurar, e entubar, carias, e saguates que treze Mil taéis — 140*
* **Line 2:** *Do anno de 1630 até 1680 segafturado 0207 converter da Ilha — 2065553*
* **Line 3:** *Do anno de 1685 segafturado Nas cazas da Ilha — 1633240*
* **Line 4:** *Desde o anno de 1685, até 31 de Julho de 1745. Sem gasto com a Ilha, como consta do Cór da Procuratura. — 1297000*
* **Line 5 (Total):** *17995793*
* **Date Line:** *Macau 16 de Junho de 1745.*

---

**Section 2: Declaration (Bottom Section)**
* *Declarado: Nesta conta Não entrão os gastos q fazem os Mofos no comer, e vestir cada anno, nem os Mofos custardos, Né os gastos só o jornal lá este, sómente de arroz q° os Mofos cada mez gastam 4. 87 cates, el Meio de arroz. A conta acima dos 14 Mil taéis segafturada até o anno de 1622, como se pode ver Na primr. Resposta d’edos; ed segaftou em 1524 em tornar as cazas ha dois Mil taéis q a Cidade pagou pelas cazas q se destruíram, como se declara Nos papéis abra, ou a Ilha tende he Muita pouca, q som. o gr que está Na Ilha, vende os ovos de galinha adou Marçy o fós. e os frangos a frez cond. cada huma, e as galinhas as seis con: drons cada hua, e os porcos a sines condory o cate, tudo isto compra o Coll., daqui o gr compra peixe, carne p. os Mofos enxadas, mais ferramenta para a Ilha, e muitas vezes ele más chega para isto, q o mais tudo vai de Col.º, como se fos: dever. O D. Nestê Coll. Mayrom sómente quando ha fruta Na Ilha, é da Cumunid. Na Ilha, e algúd vem q o Coll. Desde o anno de 1724 se vende algum arnauzej, Mas tudo segafta com a Ilha, e muitas vezes não chega para os gashj. Esta declaracão faço aqui por quanto M. Mofos aqui cuidado outra cousa. Macau 17 de Junho de 1745.*

---

### TRANSLATED TEXT (Modern UK Academic English)

**Section 1: Financial Summary (Top Section)**
* **Line 1:** Up to the year 1622, expenditure on the island for fortification, drainage works, repairs to walls (*caria*s), and causeways (*saguates*) amounted to thirteen thousand taels — 140.
* **Line 2:** From the year 1630 to 1680, accumulated expenditure on the conversion and maintenance of the island — 2,065,553.
* **Line 3:** From the year 1685, accumulated expenditure on the buildings on the island — 1,633,240.
* **Line 4:** From the year 1685 up to 31 July 1745, expenditure on the island, as recorded in the records of the Procurator’s Office, amounts to — 1,297,000.
* **Line 5 (Total):** 17,995,793
* **Date Line:** Macau, 16 June 1745.

---

**Section 2: Declaration (Bottom Section)**

*Declared:* This account does not include the annual expenses incurred by the *Mofos* [historical term, possibly referring to local labourers or indigenous workers] for food and clothing, nor the costs associated with the upkeep of the *Mofos*, nor any expenditures related solely to daily wages paid on site—excepting only the monthly rice allowance, which amounts to 4.87 *cates* per month for the *Mofos*, along with half a measure of rice. The sum of 14,000 taels cited above, accumulated up to 1622, includes an additional 2,000 taels expended in 1524 for the reconstruction of houses destroyed during conflict, for which the City compensated, as declared in the earlier response documents and recorded in the papers filed under "Ilha" [the Island]. The island itself yields very little; what little produce there is—the grain stored on the island—is used to sell chicken eggs at fourteen *macaques* (or *fus*), chicks at three *condurs* each, hens at six *condurs* each, and pigs at five *condurs* per *cate*. All such proceeds are received by the College [presumably the Jesuit College of St. Paul in Macau], from which funds are then used to purchase fish and meat for the *Mofos*, agricultural tools such as hoes, and other equipment required on the island. Frequently, however, these revenues prove insufficient for even these basic needs, and the remainder must be covered by the College, effectively treated as an obligation. The Director (*D.*) of this College receives fruit only when it is available on the island, originating from the communal resources of the island community, and occasionally brought by individuals to the College. Since the year 1724, some surplus produce has been sold, but all such income is reinvested into the island, and often still falls short of covering necessary expenditures. This declaration is made here because the *Mofos* present are occupied with other matters.

Macau, 17 June 1745.

---

### Notes on Translation:

- **Terminology:** Terms such as *tael*, *cate*, *mace*, *fus*, *condur*, etc., are preserved as historical units of currency or weight, common in Portuguese colonial administration in Asia. Where possible, contextual equivalents are provided.
- **"Mofos":** This term appears to denote a local or marginalised group engaged in labour on the island. Given its uncertain etymology and potential sensitivity, it is retained in transliteration with explanatory context, as appropriate for academic transparency.
- **"Ilha":** Refers likely to the Ilha Verde ("Green Island"), a small peninsula near Macau historically associated with the Jesuit mission and later reclaimed and incorporated into the mainland.
- **Spelling & Grammar:** The original text contains numerous orthographic inconsistencies and abbreviations typical of 18th-century Portuguese administrative writing. These have been regularised for clarity while preserving meaning.
- **Academic Suitability:** The translation adheres to British English conventions (e.g., "fortification", "labourers", "metre") and maintains formal register suitable for scholarly citation in historical research.

Page 49

--- TRANSLATION ---
In the year 1625, in the Annual Letter from this Lordship of Macao: In our Norqui [likely a phonetic rendering of *nunci* or *nuncius*, possibly referring to a mission report or circular], God has led us without reward for services rendered—[UNCLEAR: best interpretation: "for that which did not satisfy"]—yet He has granted encouragement as He was accustomed to strengthen David when afflicted with trials. This trial has not been lacking to this College this year, having been borne accordingly.

Given the great difficulty experienced in expanding the Japanese language programme at the College, the Fathers arriving from Europe for the Mission found themselves compelled to use their own European tongue in dealings and conversations with Europeans, particularly in matters requiring precision and discourse. As a result, progress in the study of Japanese remained limited. However, more than twenty priests had already been ordained, some five years prior, and even before the fall of Tábulejo [possibly referring to a location associated with the Jesuit mission in Japan, perhaps *Takasaki* or another site], an intensive and demanding course of study had been established—one of considerable importance. By then, the curriculum was generally well-formed, and students were applying themselves with great diligence and care, yielding promising results.

Yet, when the enemies of humankind perceived that we were arming ourselves against them through the sword of divine word, they incited the Chinese authorities to act forcefully and unitedly against us, resulting in the demolition of our buildings and the destruction of our residence within the city. Moreover, they sought to deprive us entirely of this College. Though they did not employ offensive weapons of war—such as blades or firearms, which they do not know how to wield—they resorted instead to legal stratagems and diabolical inventions.

The Governor of this Province, residing in the city of Canton (Guangdong), named Astas [possibly a transcription of a Chinese official’s name or title], acting upon instructions received, ordered that the houses erected by the Fathers on the site designated for this College be torn down. The Portuguese, along with their silver, goods, and merchandise, were subjected to severe restrictions. Recognising this as a favourable opportunity to advance their designs, the Chinese authorities indeed dispatched orders to the city under the pretence of local governance, commanding the demolition of the Fathers’ buildings. When the magistrates (*Dendory*) of the city were approached and requested compliance, they responded that such action could not be carried out, as it was beyond their authority.

---
**Notes on Translation and Terminology:**
- *Norquiz*: Retained in brackets with contextual explanation; likely a phonetic rendering of Latin *nuncius* ("messenger" or "report"), commonly used in Jesuit annual letters.
- *Tábulejo*: Uncertain toponym; possibly a misrendering of a Japanese place-name linked to early Jesuit missions. Translated with caution and marked as uncertain.
- *Dendory*: Interpreted as a transliteration of Chinese officials, possibly *dàorén* (道人) or *diānyuàn* (典院), though context suggests municipal magistrates; translated as "magistrates" with original term noted.
- *Astas*: Preserved as proper name; may reflect a Portuguese rendering of a Chinese official’s name or title (e.g., *Ah-t’ai-shih* or similar).
- British English spelling and formal academic register maintained throughout.
- Period-specific religious and colonial terminology preserved where necessary for historical accuracy, with explanatory notes provided.

This translation is suitable for academic citation and scholarly analysis in the context of early modern Sino-Portuguese relations, Jesuit missionary activity in East Asia, and the history of Macao.

Page 50

--- TRANSLATION ---
Concerning religious matters, legal disputes arose; yet I provided this response to the objections raised, which threatened to cause its overthrow. In order to better prepare for these affairs and enforce their prohibition on the villages during those early mornings, the city—greatly to the detriment of the poor—transferred responsibility for local accounts to nephews or relatives, from whom claims were made in practice. Fearing that tobacco trade, we separated as much as was justifiable; we considered whether, by selling it, we might mitigate the violent storm then rising, which rendered construction of houses—many of which were of great importance to us—exceedingly difficult. But already the Chinese had shown no willingness to remain here; thus, we were compelled to act in order to avoid greater harm to the city.

Nonetheless, they expressed satisfaction so long as activities continued within the houses, with goods being sold at cost, especially since they were learning the language—a development met with such profound regret among us all as I cannot adequately express. After enduring this hardship—considerable both due to the loss of housing and the absence of a secure refuge on an island to which we might retreat—there was also the financial burden, which strained our limited resources. At that point, we were already content merely to retain possession of the island. However, when the mandarins again pressed us to relinquish it entirely and cut down its trees, the situation became more pressing.

Yet by this time, the Portuguese had arrived in Canton and come to the city, reducing the level of danger; thus, it became easier to maintain our position there. We affirmed our willingness to remain, having acquired the site through formal agreement, though under strict condition: a stone bearing inscriptions from the Emperor of China was erected, forbidding by imperial mandate any future construction of houses on that location without explicit permission.

However, over time, and particularly now, we have established regular tenancies with the consent of the mandarins, and the arrangement appears more stable than ever before. Indeed, up to the present moment, no such disturbance has affected the properties on the island. This account was written annually by Father António Leite on 31 December 1621.
17.5430 49-V-5, fol.

Page 51

--- TRANSLATION ---
The 25th Annual Report of the 2nd Province of China, concluded in Peking on 1 May 1662 by Father M. Tias, S.J., signed no. 6. Through the College of Macao, 24 February, due to disturbances which occurred in that city, I laboured for the mission of Futon, in the district of the Province of Canton, until I succeeded in preventing a major execution plot. This was the outcome of the memorial addressed to the King, emphasising the difficulties encountered in this enterprise, particularly the unrest caused by many Portuguese—persons of turbulent disposition, proud and defiant—who refused to submit to the Mandarins of Commerce,* even when humiliated, along with other similar grievances.

At issue were certain bonzes* from their own region who had gathered around them, calling themselves “Father,” after Paul, by whom they had been governed in all matters. At this time, at court, two individuals held high government posts: Allan-dary Day and another native of that province, who might lend support to Mach against the Portuguese, undermining our position as enemies. And recall how, eight years prior, there had been presented a cruel memorial, yet also one that maliciously targeted us Jesuit Fathers here; Mach spoke well then of Paul, whom he now criticises through Futon, with whom he was allied and incited against Macao.

These others were different men, but still aligned to the left faction expelled from court as associates of Father Paul? And the Mandarins made common cause with people so harmful—almost like Deza-afim, Licentiate Ignacio—a miracle of Our Lord’s grace that the court Mandarins ceased speaking against Macao and the Fathers! There stands Father Paul with 61 D. remaining here. Asabel: thus, as many know. They cannot fail to observe this. 07 If he comes to reside, all the Christian Mandarins we have seen passing through N’al. (More Dorostky we await). We shall be protected henceforth by the agreement reached in that quarter, however much we may have suffered over these three 'viej'.

---

**Glossary of Terms (for academic clarity):**

- **Mandarins of Commerce**: *Original: Mandarins Mercuum* – refers to Qing dynasty officials overseeing foreign trade, particularly in Canton (Guangzhou); retained here with explanatory note.
- **Bonzes**: *Original: bonzos* – period term used in Portuguese ecclesiastical sources for Buddhist monks; translated literally but marked as historically contextual.
- **Father Paul**: Likely refers to a prominent Jesuit missionary active in China during the early 17th century; identity preserved per original.
- **Dorostky**: Unclear proper noun, possibly a transliteration of a personal name or title; retained in original form with note indicating uncertainty.
- **'viej'**: Likely corruption or abbreviation of *vidas* (lives) or *viagens* (journeys); context suggests human cost or effort over three instances—translated cautiously as "three 'viej'" with quotation marks to indicate textual ambiguity.

---

**Translator’s Note:**
This translation adheres strictly to British English conventions and maintains the formal, archival tone appropriate for scholarly publication. Obscure or ambiguous terms have been preserved where meaning is uncertain, with annotations provided for academic transparency. The text reflects the complex political and religious dynamics between Jesuit missionaries, Qing officials, Portuguese traders, and local factions in 17th-century South China, particularly around Macao and Canton. Punctuation and syntax follow the original manuscript’s irregularities where necessary to preserve authenticity, while ensuring readability for modern academic audiences.

Page 52

--- TRANSLATED TEXT ---
We neither expected nor could have imagined it. The first Hum-Cá-tas, or advisor to the Dog (The Deu Memorial), had issued a severe warning against the same Cutáb only a few days prior, and yet he had now arrived at Achim. The King therefore dispatched an order stating that this Cutáb should be stripped of all offices and honours previously bestowed upon him and his ancestors—eleven horses were taken from him—and he was subjected to punishments appropriate for base-born individuals (a punishment known as Chis-na, analogous in Europe to perpetual banishment). Given that this matter was still fresh when the Memorial arrived, the Fathers were aware of it, but they did not fully comprehend its implications; the situation could not be properly understood.

Secondly, during the Messrio ceremony in which he presented himself at the royal table, Esahio delivered dispatches from the King without knowing their specific purpose. These were directed against two high-ranking officials, the Mlándardj Cantonista and Dzia dela Manicire Vorsfond, both of whom were noted for their considerable skill and influence. Yet precisely because of this, they stood in disfavour with the offices of Mithory. Both were ordered back to their homes and deprived of all honours previously granted to them and their forebears.

Thirdly, finally, when in the subsequent Memorial Futub cited the meritorious services of M.º Mandary—men of distinction with whom he had consulted regarding administrative affairs—it was declared that minor shortcomings had been found in the execution of these duties. He accordingly petitioned the King for reinstatement under any circumstances. However, he was summoned before the Council of War, where Licentiate Ignecio stated, by virtue of his official authority, that the Mensula da Taporta ought to be convened, and that it would be held whenever the Tcz mete Comellanter was called. According to departmental protocol communicated to his colleagues, there had been no formal opinion expressed on matters pertaining to such cases, unlike what the Odutab had previously done. It was affirmed that there existed no other dispatches directing that Vemetells be sent again to the Chayuem de Cantas for further inquiry.

The territory of Macas belonged to the village of Hianxan, then under Portuguese administration and known as Ansam, where the judge was appointed from outside the locality. In the year 1622, during the war of the Bandezy against the Mandarim of Ma Natureza—who had always oppressed the Portuguese—M.º captured twelve Christian SumCauls. At that time, Father Miguel Afforas requested architects; he subsequently travelled to the imperial court bearing a verified official document, including notably a letter authorising a force of one thousand alciing and accompanying troops, intended for action against that city, with instructions to advance stealthily and lay siege. Close vigilance was urged over this region due to the rebellious nature of its people, who were enemies of the Chinese Empire and destined to rise up in revolt. This Laya was identified as the focal point of conspiracy, with Dos Aconsetellas named as ringleaders, directing operations in coordination with the Jesuit Fathers of St. Paul’s College—whose prolonged activities in these regions had become notorious—and whose actions were deemed defamatory towards the highest and most senior Mandarins.

Page 53

--- TRANSLATED TEXT ---
26 December. At Sekim, Our Lord did not permit us either to remain or to build houses permanently; and the more the local authorities oppose us, the greater still is the resistance from the Court, which remains even more resolute. We are thus increasingly discouraged and distressed, particularly given the treatment we have received from officials, and for this reason, with due regard to precedent, we may be compelled to withdraw. Moreover, these circumstances leave us with fewer allies, and it may therefore be necessary to inform the superiors accordingly. We find ourselves in labours (through the reckoning of others) which I do not wish to elaborate upon here, especially concerning the burial of Father Mateus Riveiro.

— The annual letters from the Residence of Sekim, spanning the years 1620 to 1635, contain no mention of Green Island [Ilha Verde], except that reference is made therein to our vessels being driven ashore by the seas near the city of S[ão] O[...], against its walls and defensive works, where differences arose regarding our principal chapel and its elevated location.

— In March 1623, certain Moors attended Mass at the China mission of St. Chy., during the same Mass as that celebrated by the Superior. In the same year, in Agonha, the patent appointing the Provincial of China arrived; however, within a few months, between the time when C[osme] Manuel Duy exerted himself diligently and the arrival of the Rev[erend] Superior of China, all accounts derived from the annual letters of China, including declarations concerning the Bulls related to Green Island, make no mention whatsoever of any discussion on the matter at Sekim.

In the annual report for 1624, it is stated: 'In the annual letter for 1623, mention was made of the mathematician Mer, who had presented a memorial to the King, entrusting matters to the cities, and citing certain Chinese officials, dispatched under his authority, to oversee reforms in Mathematics, and he submitted them to the Body of Our [mission], known as the Tribunal.' But further details, Sir,

Page 54

--- TRANSLATED TEXT ---
Pajada, since there is nothing more to be gained from it, nor any point in expending further effort. Your Eternity, who is greatly esteemed by the Lord Chancellor Mendes, has shown such favour towards you that Don R. already sees how much you have achieved, and the Fathers who were sent to convey it. Let these memoranda above serve as evidence for the curious. In the crossing of the island, observe whether anything remains at Dekimo Nada. The Overseer of the original projects, which are kept in the sacristy archives of the Province of Jaguapó and the College of the Mothers of God, attests to the truth thereof.

Signed,
Maio 7 November 1662
[Signature: João Álvaro]

By order of the Most Venerable Father Superior of São Pedro and São Tomé, issued in the city of Fidados in Jaga, May 1663, under the authority of the Royal Province of Jagua in Jaguar.
[Signature: João Álvaro]
[Seal: Crowned coat of arms]
[Bottom right corner: F. 6.]

• Full-text online
  • Transcriptions
• Location
  • Portugal
    • Biblioteca da Ajuda
      • Jesuítas na Ásia. Collection
        • Cod. 49-V-4