Your search

Consulado Português em Banguecoque

Carta do Consul em Cantao para o Ministro e Secretario de Negocios Estrangeiros, com as copias de correspondencias trocadas sobre os disturbios contra a Missao em Hainan

This transcription comprises two historical documents from the late 19th century, originating from T’an-wen under the jurisdiction of Chiung-shan magistrate, dated 16th day of the second lunar month, 1890 (Gregorian: March 18, 1890). Document I is a list of nineteen individuals implicated in an uprising against the Catholic Mission, including Chang-Jui-Ching, Chang-Chung-Piao, and others from villages such as Hao-chün-iuen, Chia-hu, and Lo-wan. Document II is a letter from Ma-Fu-Iao, Superior of the Catholic Mission, addressed to Magistrate Wang-Tsi-Chang, detailing a dispute over rice measurement standards in T’an-wen’s market. The Mission had funded the creation of standardized measures and collected a rental fee of two sapecas per use, managed by Catholic Chan-Siung-Shang. In the preceding year, local elder Chang-Jui-Ching sought to seize control of the revenue, claiming it should fund a school; the Mission granted him one year’s rent to avoid conflict. In the current year, the Mission ordered Siung-Shang to reclaim the measures, but Chang-Jui-Ching refused, conspired with accomplices including Iang-Hung-Chiue and Iang-Hung-Ie, and falsely accused Siung-Shang of instigating violence against them. The magistrate ordered local officials to interrogate the parties, but they encountered Siung-Shang on the street. These documents provide insight into colonial-era local governance, religious mission dynamics, economic regulation, and communal conflict in Fujian, China, during the late Qing period.

Cartas do Governador do Bispado de Macau para o Consul em Cantao

Sobre Missao Portuguesa em Hainan (Tang Van). De Consul Geral para o Ministro de MNE. Manuscrito com as copias das Cartas para o Governo Eclesisatico da Diocese de Macau. inclusas.

Carta do Vicerey do Cantao para o Consul em Cantao, com os varios documentos sobre as occorencias em Hainan

Carta do Consul geral para Ministro e Secretario de Estado e Negocios Estrangeiros sobre occorencias em Hainan

Carta do Consul geral para Ministro e Secretario de Estado e Negocios Estrangeiros sobre occorencias em Hainan contra a Missao portuguesa

Carta do Consul em Cantao para o Ministro de Portugal em Peking sobre a questao de Hainan

Carta do Consul em Cantao o Ministro e Secretario de Negocios Estrangeiros sobre a questao de Hainan

Correspondencia do Governador do Bispado em Macau com Consul em Cantão

This 1907–1909 diplomatic and ecclesiastical correspondence, originating from the French Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Ministry of the Colonies, documents the protracted negotiation and eventual transfer of religious jurisdiction over Hainan Island from Portuguese to French Catholic missions. Rooted in the 1857 and 1886 Concordats between the Holy See and Portugal, the dispute centres on the retrocession of Hainan—formally under the Bishop of Macao’s jurisdiction—to the French Apostolic Vicariate of Guangdong, led by Bishop Jean M. Mercier (Mérel). Despite a 1903 decree by the Congregation for the Propagation of the Faith and a clarifying pontifical decree of 16 March 1904 confirming the exchange of Hainan for the Chaoqingfu (Zhaoqing) district—excluding three contested sub-prefectures—the implementation was delayed due to disputes over property valuation and compensation. The Bishop of Macao, d’Azevedo, acknowledged a 41,073 piastre deficit in favour of the French mission, but refused indemnity payments, prompting resistance from Mercier. The file reveals inter-imperial tensions between France and Portugal, with both states leveraging ecclesiastical authority to advance colonial influence in southern China. By October 1908, French missionaries formally assumed control of Hainan, though concerns persisted regarding inadequate financial support, competition from American and German Protestant missions, and the strategic implications for French political influence. The documents provide critical insight into the intersection of religious diplomacy, colonial ambition, and Sino-Vatican relations in late Qing China.

This 1907 ecclesiastical and diplomatic correspondence, originating from the Portuguese Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Diocese of Macau, and colonial administrative offices, documents the protracted negotiations between the Bishop of Macau and the Apostolic Prefect of Canton concerning the exchange of ecclesiastical jurisdictions over Hainan Island and the Shaoqing (or Shew-ing) district. The dispute arose from the implementation of a 1903 decree by the Congregation for the Propagation of the Faith, later clarified by a pontifical rescript of 16 March 1904, which mandated the transfer of Hainan to the jurisdiction of the Apostolic Prefecture of Canton in exchange for the Shaoqing district being assigned to the Diocese of Macau. Despite formal agreement on the territorial exchange, resistance emerged over claims of compensation based on discrepancies in mission property valuations and opposition from French missionaries operating under the Paris Foreign Missions Society. The Bishop of Macau contested demands for financial indemnity, asserting that the papal decrees did not permit such conditions and that prior precedent—specifically the 1874 annexation of Hainan to Macau—had involved no compensation. The file includes official dispatches, telegrams, inventories, and memoranda detailing failed handover attempts, political interventions by the Portuguese and French governments, and the Bishop of Macau’s personal appeal to the Holy See in Rome during 1907. Ultimately, the Holy See reaffirmed the original terms, rejecting additional claims and insisting on the unqualified execution of the jurisdictional exchange. This document provides critical insight into ecclesiastical diplomacy, colonial-era church-state relations, and the interplay between local missionary interests and transnational religious authority in early 20th-century China.

This 1894 official correspondence, originating from the Portuguese Ministry of Foreign Affairs (General Directorate of Political and Diplomatic Affairs, 1st Division, Lisbon), concerns ecclesiastical jurisdictional disputes in southern China during the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. The document comprises copies of communications between the Bishop of Macau, the Secretary of State for Overseas Affairs, and the Portuguese Minister in Paris, relating to the implementation of a territorial exchange agreement between the Diocese of Macau and the Apostolic Prefecture of Canton. Central to the matter is the reciprocal transfer of jurisdictions over Hainan Island and the Shao-king (Shap Kung/Sheung-king) district, initially agreed upon following negotiations culminating in a papal decree of 16 March 1864 and reaffirmed by the Congregation for the Propagation of the Faith on 3 February 1903. The Bishop of Macau reports persistent obstruction by the Apostolic Prefect of Canton in executing the transfer, despite prior agreements and Vatican approval. Key issues include resistance from French missionaries under the Paris Foreign Missions Society, delays in handing over mission properties, and alleged diplomatic interference. The text reveals tensions between Portuguese Padroado claims and French ecclesiastical influence in China, as well as Portugal’s efforts to assert its ecclesiastical authority through diplomatic channels with both the Holy See and the French government. This document provides critical insight into colonial religious politics, Sino-European ecclesiastical diplomacy, and the decline of Portuguese ecclesiastical privileges in Asia.

This official correspondence, dated 18 September 1906, originates from the Secretariat of State of His Holiness and is addressed to the Chargé d’Affaires of Portugal accredited to the Holy See. The document records a formal communication by Cardinal P. Merry del Val, Secretary of State, concerning the ecclesiastical recognition of the feast day of Saint Francis Xavier within the Diocese of Macao. It details that the Portuguese Ambassador had requested, during the previous August, the formal establishment of 3 December as a feast day in Macao, following the precedent granted the prior year for the Churches of the East Indies. The letter confirms that the Holy Father has approved this request and encloses the decree issued by the Sacred Congregation of Rites for transmission to the Bishop who initiated the petition. The primary subject matter concerns the extension of liturgical privileges to the Diocese of Macao under Portuguese ecclesiastical patronage, reflecting the diplomatic and religious relations between Portugal and the Holy See in the early 20th century. The document also includes a marginal notation—“Ammesso reggimento”—of unclear significance. As a piece of Vatican diplomatic correspondence, it provides insight into the administrative processes of the Roman Curia, the role of Catholic ceremonial in colonial contexts, and the continued influence of Portugal in ecclesiastical affairs in its overseas territories, particularly Macao. This manuscript is a valuable source for researchers examining church-state relations, colonial religious policy, and the global reach of Catholic liturgical authority in the late imperial period.