Your search
Results 2 resources
-
This transcription comprises the official acts and decrees of the First Plenary Council of China, convened in Shanghai in 1924 under the authority of the Apostolic Delegate, Archbishop Celsus Costantini, Titular Archbishop of Theodosia. The document records canonical legislation, administrative directives, and pastoral guidelines formulated by forty-six bishops, three apostolic prefects, and thirty-seven religious superiors for the governance of Catholic missions across China. It addresses ecclesiastical structure, sacramental discipline, clerical formation, missionary conduct, and relations with civil authorities and non-Christian traditions. Central themes include the establishment of quasi-parishes, regulation of Chinese rites, prohibition of superstition, promotion of indigenous clergy, and the integration of mission territories into universal canon law. The text also contains petitions to the Holy See concerning matrimonial dispensations, liturgical faculties, and the dogmatic definition of Mary as Mediatrix of All Graces, alongside procedural norms for matrimonial tribunals and educational institutions. As a foundational ecclesiastical record, it reflects the institutionalisation of the Catholic Church in early twentieth-century China within the framework of Roman centralisation and colonial-era mission policy.
-
This 1924 ecclesiastical letter, authored by the Bishop of Macau and addressed to the Portuguese Minister to the Vatican, constitutes a formal response to the Decree of 30 October 1923 issued by the Sacred Congregation for Extraordinary Ecclesiastical Affairs, which extended the authority of the Apostolic Delegate in China to the Diocese of Macau. The document outlines the historical jurisdictional isolation of the Diocese of Macau under the Portuguese Padroado system, detailing its dependence on the Metropolitan See of Goa and the Apostolic Nunciature in Lisbon for communications with the Holy See. The bishop argues that this arrangement resulted in practical disadvantages, including exclusion from episcopal conferences, denial of voting rights, and inability to access mission subsidies from the Society for the Propagation of the Faith, despite hierarchical parity with Apostolic Vicars in China. He recounts personal experiences from his tenure as Vicar Capitular in 1918 and his non-participation in preparatory meetings for the First Chinese National Council due to jurisdictional ambiguities. The letter asserts that the 1923 Decree, while ending a long-standing privilege, effectively integrates the Diocese of Macau into the broader Chinese ecclesiastical structure, granting equal faculties, inclusion in decision-making processes, and improved access to resources. The author concludes that the measure resolves longstanding administrative and pastoral impediments, affirming its benefits for the mission in China. This primary source is critical for understanding ecclesiastical politics, colonial religious patronage, and Sino-Vatican relations in early 20th-century East Asia.