Your search

This archival document, held at the Arquivo Histórico Ultramarino (AHU) and bearing the ‘ARQUIVO COLONIAL’ stamp, comprises a formal recommendation dated 15 August 1644—recorded in the appendix of the *Vitae* manuscript, Volume 2—and concerns the appointment of personnel for a Portuguese naval expedition to China. The text outlines three candidates proposed to the Royal Military Governor for leadership roles: Chibhuard (Senhor Ement. Caua W.), a Knight of the Order of Christ with extensive experience in the South Seas and China coast, captured at Malacca; Francisco Fentão, also a Knight of the Order of Christ, who served at Cochin and Malacca, sailed previously to China, and held military ranks including *Sargento-mor* and *Capitão-mor* of two *praos*; and Captain Manuel Cordiaz, an exceptionally skilled pilot qualified to serve simultaneously as captain and pilot, with service in the *Fazenda Real* and long-standing distinction under the Royal Military Governor. The document further notes Lomeiro—the chief of three Indian pilots—as appointed to depart on 21 October 1641 for China, potentially serving as pilot on the outward voyage, and recommends his appointment as vessel captain. A marginal note references St. November, while later pages identify Dom Henrique de Amaral as Naval Captain of the Oceanic Division and Commander-in-Chief of the China Station, with archival provenance linked to Macau, Box 3, Document 43. The document is endorsed with contemporary marginalia, stamps, and archival markings including UHA, reflecting its origin and custodial history within Portuguese colonial administrative and maritime records.

This archival document comprises a composite set of seventeenth-century Portuguese colonial administrative records, primarily dated between 1643 and 1648, originating from the Estado da Índia and preserved in the Arquivo Histórico Ultramarino (Lisbon) and related repositories including the Biblioteca Nacional de Portugal and the Círculo Histórico de Lisboa. The material includes official correspondence, edicts, financial instructions, and council deliberations concerning maritime logistics, customs levies (*prêos*), naval losses, and ecclesiastical administration across key nodes of the Portuguese imperial network—specifically Macaé, Goa, Malacca, Macau, Manila, and the South China Sea. Central figures include Dom Conde de Aveiro (Viceroy of India), Luís de Cardoso (Captain-General of Malacca), Bishop Pinha (Pinaça), the Count of Foz, and officials such as João da Silva and Pedro José Delgado. Key subjects encompass the foundering of the *Tutulorim* at the Cape, the unlocated third vessel from Cochin presumed detained at Malacca, the death of English captain Nabiga in combat, Dutch and English activity in Malacca, the seizure of three Portuguese vessels by Chinese mandarins, provisioning challenges in Goa, and administrative arrangements for ecclesiastical revenue officers (*dezis*) under the jurisdiction of Malacca and Manila. The documents reflect urgent concerns over political isolation, fiscal accountability, inter-imperial competition, and the governance of distant outposts within the broader framework of Iberian global empire.

This archival document comprises a multi-page colonial administrative record originating from the Portuguese Empire’s overseas territories, dated between 1644 and 1675, with marginalia, official stamps, and signatures indicating provenance from the Arquivo Histórico Ultramarino (Lisbon), the Arquivo Histórico Colonial da Guiné e Cabo Verde, and the Biblioteca e Arquivo da Santa Casa da Misericórdia. It includes correspondence and reports concerning maritime logistics, port infrastructure, ecclesiastical administration, and civil governance across Macau, Goa, Lisbon, and the Cape Verde archipelago—specifically the islands of Fogo, São Nicolau, Santo Antão, and Santiago. Key figures named include Dom Francisco da China Ate Jialho (Captain-Major), João de Carvalho, Fernandes de Maguay, Luís de Faria do, João Fábio da Caria, and C. B. Fialho (a friar). The text details the dispatch of carracks from Macau (*Amaquao*) to Goa and Lisbon; navigational hazards encountered by the vessel *P. Ando*; inspections of the ports of São Filipe and Praia on Fogo; deficiencies in harbour works, pastoral care, and fiscal administration on Fogo; logistical operations at Angra do Sol, Ribeira Grande, Porto Novo, and Sinagoga; and a final report on ballasting and fortification concerns at Amboim and São Jorge da Mina, dated 20 February 1675. The document serves as a primary source for studying Portuguese imperial administration, maritime logistics, colonial infrastructure, and ecclesiastical jurisdiction in the mid-to-late seventeenth century.

This archival document, dated 26 April 1644 and held at the Arquivo Histórico Ultramarino (AHU) under reference Macau, Box 1, Document 40, comprises an official petition and administrative memorandum concerning Dom Luís de Almeida, a Magual—a local intermediary or native official in the Portuguese colonial administration—based in Macau. The text records his request for formal confirmation of continued embarkation status aboard a *louara* (a shallow-draft coastal vessel used in the Portuguese Estado da Índia), a voyage undertaken during the governorship of Dom Luís Cadella (1639–1640) to fulfil conditions for appointment to an official post, specifically enabling him to ‘pronounce’—that is, assume formal administrative authority. The petition seeks reissuance in the name of the current Governor-General of Macau of two customary entitlements: *caluara*, a fixed staple allowance (typically rice), and *craçtem*, a lump-sum gratuity, both due for official voyages. A supporting opinion from the Office recommends issuance of a formal warrant (*meue*) authorising payment, affirming that stipulated conditions have been met. A second folio notes Dom Luís de Almeida’s subsequent petition to His Majesty requesting rescission of the original royal warrant (*alvará*) authorising the voyage. The document thus provides primary evidence on colonial administrative procedures, patronage networks, and material provisions governing official mobility and office-holding in mid-seventeenth-century Portuguese Macau.

This archival document comprises a composite set of Portuguese colonial administrative records, primarily dating to January 1644, originating from the Estado da Índia and concerning logistical, fiscal, and naval operations centred on Macau. It includes royal warrants, cargo manifests (*gesso*), provisioning orders, appointment instruments, and fiscal instructions issued by or under authority of the Portuguese Crown—specifically referencing King Philip II—and executed by officials including João de Sampaio, Jorge de Melo Jorge de Albuquerque (acting), Gonçalo Fernandes Lima, João da Silva, and António Groudo. Key locations encompass Lisbon, Macau (designated as situated in northeastern China), Goa, Veleza (likely the Azores), São Tomé, and Candelária. The core subject matter pertains to the regulation and dispatch of two vessels—the *Santo André* and *Santo António* (also referenced as *Santos Antónios*, *Santo António de Aveiro*, and *Dona Clara*)—carrying cargoes including 500–700 *centos* of Bengal/Coromandel cotton cloth (*ondo*), 800–1,200 *botijas* of olive oil, 400 *tonéis* of Red Sea coral, 100 ivory tusks (with detailed weight specifications calibrated to Macau’s local *Cidade de Degre* standard), and provisions for personnel and garrisons. The documents further address the appointment of António Falto Forreiro as Captain-Major and administrator of enslaved persons (*Offício de Escravos*), the assignment of royal revenues (*quina*), exemption from port dues (*foros*), recovery of royal estates in Macau, and urgent procurement of artillery and fortification materials. All materials are preserved in the Arquivo Histórico Ultramarino (Lisbon), bearing archival references M37A1, M37A2, H37-A3, H3448, and H3495.

This is a formal administrative and judicial document from the Portuguese colonial archives, dated 1642–1646, concerning the arrest, imprisonment, and extrajudicial murder of Diogo Vaz Freire, Administrator of the Royal Treasury (*administrador da fazenda real*) in Macau, by Dom Sebastião Lobo da Silveira, Captain-General of the same city. The document comprises a detailed account of the charges against Lobo, including his abuse of authority, unlawful seizure of royal and private property, systematic obstruction of fiscal administration, violent suppression of dissent, and the brutal killing of Vaz Freire and his servant on 4 May 1643 within the Convento do Capítulo in Macau. It records the subsequent investigation by the Overseas Council (*Conselho Ultramarino*), testimonies from witnesses including municipal officials, clergy, and royal magistrates, Lobo’s self-incriminating correspondence, and the Council’s recommendation for his immediate arrest, trial, and exemplary punishment. Key locations include Macau (referred to in contemporary usage as *São Paulo na China*), Goa, Lisbon, and Manila; central figures are Diogo Vaz Freire, Dom Sebastião Lobo da Silveira, Dona Francisca Sacramento (Vaz Freire’s widow), and multiple royal officials including the Viceroy of India and members of the Royal Treasury Council. The document serves as a primary source for analysing colonial governance, jurisdictional conflict between fiscal and military authorities, the operation of royal justice in the Estado da Índia, and the use of archival documentation in early modern Iberian imperial accountability mechanisms.

This archival document, dated 2nd January 1644 and held in the Arquivo Histórico do Estado (reference H35, Macau Series 1, Document 35), is an official Portuguese administrative communication originating from the Overseas Council in Lisbon and addressed to the Viceroy of India, Dom António de Noronha, 1st Count of Linhares (serving 1640–1642). It concerns the royal appointment of a *feitor* (fiscal agent) to the royal treasury (*fazenda*) of the Municipal Council (*Senado*) of Macau, then part of the Portuguese Estado da Índia but situated within the Kingdom of China. The document records the King’s directive—conveyed via royal letter patent (*carta régia*)—that the Archbishop of Goa appoint a suitable candidate for this post, prompted by the failure of a prior provision (*provisão*) issued in Goa to yield an acceptable appointee from Portuguese India. In response, the *Senado* of Macau recommended three local residents: João de Abreu (confirmed candidate), Francisco Carvalho of Canda, and António Roiz. The text further references a separate petition before the Overseas Council regarding the potential appointment of Dr Ruy Fêz, a stipendiary student under the Archbishopric of Goa, to the same office. Signed by João da Silva, Inspector of Appeals and Inspector of Accounts, the document reflects institutional tensions between metropolitan authority, viceregal administration, and municipal autonomy in the governance of Macau’s royal finances during the mid-seventeenth century.

Petition submitted to the Overseas Council in April 1644 by Father Álvaro Semedo, Procurator General of the Province of China of the Society of Jesus, on behalf of the Jesuit mission in China. The document details the severe financial distress faced by the missionaries due to the non-payment of stipends for approximately twenty years, resulting in extreme poverty and the deterioration of church infrastructure in Macau. Semedo asserts that despite repeated appeals, no relief has been granted, with arrears amounting to between fifty thousand and one hundred and fifty thousand cruzados, owed not in coin but through two immediate drafts on Locoambique. He emphasizes the missionaries’ longstanding service to the Portuguese Crown since the foundation of Macau and appeals to the monarch’s conscience, urging urgent payment or the initiation of a formal inquiry through the Reverend Judge of the Inquisition. The text also references procedural delays, including the deposition of the designated investigator Terbo and opposition to recent claims. Additionally, Semedo petitions against the establishment of a new Corôs settlement without prior investigation into the conduct of former official Antonin Belle Que Staiagi, currently under scrutiny alongside others at Aley Dellaagardeside. A subsequent note records the Bishop’s inability to attend proceedings due to pressing duties, though he affirmed compliance with royal directives regarding clerical administration. The document originates from colonial archival holdings, bearing marginalia, seals, and archival references consistent with Portuguese imperial administrative practice in Asia during the mid-seventeenth century.

This abstract describes a formal petition dated 1644, originating from Chinese Christian residents of Macau and addressed to the Portuguese monarch. The document is preserved in the Arquivo Histórico Ultramarino (AHU) in Lisbon, bearing archival identifiers including ‘India’ and ‘1644’ on its first page and a marginal note indicating dispatch under cover of a letter dated 24 January (year unspecified but contextually consistent with 1644). The petitioners—self-identified as loyal vassals and members of the Confraternity of Jesus—detail longstanding civic contributions, particularly their foundational role in administering the Santa Casa da Misericórdia and maintaining its hospital. They enumerate six principal grievances: restrictions on coastal trade; compulsory unpaid watch duty in Canton despite reliance on manual labour; enforced abandonment of the *capa* garment used to conceal poverty; non-enforcement of debts owed by Portuguese creditors; unlawful diversion of legacies to the royal exchequer; and verbal and physical abuse that undermines Christian conversion efforts. The petition requests reinstatement of qualified Chinese Christians to governance roles within the Santa Casa, liberty of emigration, judicial redress through formal *devassa*, enforcement of widow’s guardianship rights under the *Ordenações do Reino*, and extension of privileges equivalent to those granted to Christians in Portuguese India and Ceylon. An administrative endorsement directs transmission to the Viceroy of India, stressing urgency due to Macau’s current state of being ‘combattida por inimigos’.