Search

This article treats the familiar triad “Gold, God, and Glory” as a heuristic to track how commercial, missionary, and reputational aims were configure...

D. Sinibaldo de Mas o ministro espanhol que inventou o iberismo e que queria comprar Macau para vender à China

In the mid 19th century the Spanish diplomat Sinibaldo de Más, after spending a period in the territory of Macao where he formulated his theories about the Iberian Peninsula, wrote a book which is considered to be a decisive contribution for the diffusion of the Iberian issue. This work that supported a peaceful union between Portugal and Spain under a common monarchy, was published five times in Spain and three times in Portugal. Latino Coelho and Carlos José Caldeira played an important role in the co-ordination of the Portuguese editions of the Ibéria, as well as in the organisation of other activities promoting the association of the two Iberian States, events in which Sinibaldo de Más was also involved.

This is a scholarly transcription of a 1712 historical document: *A Sincere and True Account of the Lawful Defence of the Royal Prerogatives and Privileges of the Crown of Portugal in the City of Macau*, composed by Dr Dom Félix Leal de Castro in Macau on 4 February 1712 and printed in Xiangshan. The text constitutes a formal rebuttal to an anonymous 1712 Augustinian account concerning ecclesiastical jurisdictional conflicts arising from the presence in Macau of Cardinal Charles-Thomas Maillard de Tournon, Patriarch of Antioch and Apostolic Legate to China. It details the protracted dispute (1705–1712) between Portuguese civil and ecclesiastical authorities—including the Bishop and Captain-General of Macau, the Viceroy of Portuguese India, and the Primate Archbishop—over the Patriarch’s claim to exercise jurisdiction in Macau without presenting papal bulls formally ratified by the Royal Council of Portugal (*Conselho Ultramarino*) or obtaining prior royal consent. Central figures include the Patriarch; Captain-General Diogo de Lino Teixeira and his successor Francisco de Mello e Castro; Bishop of Macau; Vicar General of the diocese; Prior Fray Constantino del Espíritu Santo of the Augustinian Convent; and Provincial Father Francisco Pinto of the Society of Jesus. The document records key events: the Patriarch’s 1705 arrival and restricted activities in Macau; the 1707 council of the Three Estates affirming royal prerogatives (*regalias da Coroa*); the imposition and subsequent modification of the Patriarch’s custody; the 1708–1710 expulsions and arrests of religious loyal to the Patriarch—including Augustinians and Dominicans—and the renewal of prohibitions against their convents; the 1709 royal decrees (*cédulas*) confirming the Crown’s position; the Patriarch’s death in June 1710; and the 1712 handover of the Augustinian Convent to secular clergy. All assertions are grounded in archival instruments, official correspondence, canonical procedure, and juridical reasoning rooted in the Portuguese *regalia* and papal privileges granted to the Crown.

Dans le fief de Shimabara, l’évangélisation connaît le succès à la suite de la conversion de son seigneur (daimyo), Arima Harunobu (1561?-1612), en 1580. Cependant, entre 1612 et 1615, les premières arrestations et exécutions de catholiques ordonnées par le successeur de Harunobu, Arima Naozumi (1586-1641), et les autorités de Nagasaki ébranlent les chrétiens. Après dix années de (relatif ) répit, Matsukura Shigemasa (1574-1630), le seigneur du fief depuis 1616, orchestre une nouvelle vague de répression visant à saper l’organisation religieuse des villages en coupant leurs liens avec le clergé et en soumettant les figures laïques locales. Entre 1625 et 1630, plus de soixante-dix fidèles perdent la vie, et pratiquement la totalité de la population est contrainte de renier formellement le christianisme. Cette période de cinq années est très bien documentée grâce aux sources missionnaires et à des chroniques japonaises régionales. Or, les recherches précédentes ont généralement négligé ces documents ou les ont étudiés séparément. Cet article montre que leur examen comparatif rend possible l’étude, à micro-échelle, de la logique répressive, de l’équilibre des forces dans les villages, de l’ambivalence des chrétiens face à la clandestinité et de l’apostolat des derniers missionnaires. En d’autres termes, ces témoignages nous permettent de réévaluer selon différents points de vue l’expérience de ces communautés durant la période d’interdiction, quelques années avant la révolte de Shimabara-Amakusa (1637-1638).

This abstract describes a Qing dynasty administrative document—a formal dispatch (*pai xing*) issued in October 1741 (sixth year of the Qianlong reign) by the Deputy Magistrate of Xiangshan County, Guangzhou Prefecture, holding an Additional Rank of First Grade. The document concerns the investigation of a theft committed against the residence of Ambitide, a foreign resident in Macau, and records procedural directives issued to the Macau *Ting* (Office of the Macau Intendant) for inquiry, evidence collection, and reporting. Key figures include Magistrate Wang of Xiangshan County—described as holding an Additional Rank of First Grade and awarded one record of meritorious service—and the Macau Foreign Headman (*Yí Mù*). The text details bureaucratic protocols including deadlines denoted as ‘Ghost Day’, requirements for sworn depositions distinguishing *qie* (theft) from *qiang* (robbery), submission of seven certified copies (*yi yang qi ben*) of the investigative dossier, and consequences for non-compliance (*gan jiu*). It further references ancillary administrative actions involving the Joint Council (*Lianzong*), official messengers (*Wen Cha*), and monetary settlements in *wén*, silver dollars (*yinyang*), and Japanese silver (*Riyin*), all situated within the jurisdictional framework of coastal Guangdong’s foreign affairs administration. The document is preserved with archival register number Qianlong 6 / 473 and exhibits physical degradation consistent with mid-Qing paper-based yamen records.

The Apologia, written by Valignano between 1597 and 1598, documenting the confrontation between Jesuits and Franciscans, develops some arguments associated with the rights of the Iberian crowns in East Asia. According to the Franciscan argument, the right to the Castilian Padroado in Japan stemmed from the legitimacy of the Castilian Crown in legislating on religious matters, which ran counter to the papal breve Ex pastoralis officio (1585) of Gregory XIII. For Valignano, the Holy See could never abdicate the right to legislate on evangelical issues. The legitimacy of the papal letter of Gregory XIII was much broader, insofar as the Church found the most adequate way of establishing itself in Japan through the exclusive Jesuit presence. In this way, the analysis of the debate over Portuguese-Castilian rights in East Asia, in the context of rivalry between religious orders, will always have to take into consideration two different concepts of the Church and evangelisation.

This fragmentary ecclesiastical and administrative document, originating from a Portuguese colonial context likely in Asia or Africa during the 17th century, comprises a series of missionary reports, spiritual accounts, and institutional records spanning multiple locations including Xiamen (Cinhina), Su-idê, Macau, Goa, and regions associated with the Chinese interior and coastal provinces. The text details the activities of Jesuit and other Catholic missionaries, notably Fathers Francisco Brancato, Julio Aldeni, João Adam, and Miguel Irigaut, under the ecclesiastical jurisdiction of the Diocesan and Metropolitan See of China. Central themes include the administration of sacraments—particularly Holy Baptism and Confession—among local Christian communities and catechumens, efforts to combat idolatry and demonic influence, and the establishment of churches and confraternities in villages such as Ké chò, Ké ngâm, and Capba. Accounts of spiritual struggles, exorcisms, visions, and martyrdom reflect the integration of European Catholic theology with local cosmologies, while references to Mandarins, Gentiles, and political authorities illustrate the complex interplay between religious mission and imperial governance. The document also records internal Church disputes, logistical challenges due to persecution and natural calamities—including locust plagues and droughts—and the veneration of saints and relics. As a composite manuscript containing marginal annotations, seals, and archival references, it provides critical insight into the operation of Lusophone missionary networks, indigenous conversions, and the socio-religious dynamics of early modern colonial Christianity.

1965年增設望德堂區和花地瑪堂區 ｜https://www.archives.gov.mo/cn/detail/38

奏報臣屬地方春間雨澤多且米價漸增每石九錢內外不等並西洋臣聶若堅交臣上用葡萄酒已賚交天主堂轉進 具奏日期： 康熙48年04月09日 (1709-05-18) 產生者：偏沅巡撫 趙申喬 硃批內容：知道了 文件類別：奏摺 形制：摺件 尺寸：20.2x9.5x14(公分) 質材：紙 關鍵字： 天主教 出版品： 《宮中檔康熙朝奏摺》第2輯，頁154

奏為在寶坻縣訪獲天主教及提省審辦緣由（附件：奏報雨雪情形片） 具奏日期： 乾隆46年12月25日 (1782-02-07) 產生者： 署直隸總督 英廉 硃批內容：知道了 文件類別：奏摺 形制： 摺件 尺寸： 21.4×9.8(公分) 質材： 紙 附件： 附件：奏報雨雪情形片 出版品： 《宮中檔乾隆朝奏摺》第50輯，頁383

This 17th-century ecclesiastical manuscript fragment, dated circa 1651, comprises a series of pastoral directives issued within the Portuguese colonial sphere, likely in India, concerning the conduct of priests in matters of marital conflict and gender relations. The document outlines strict guidelines for clerical interaction with women, particularly wives, emphasizing the avoidance of scandal (*scandalum*) and the prioritization of spiritual over temporal intervention. It prohibits priests from entertaining accusations made by wives against their husbands during confession, regardless of validity, and mandates discreet, charitable correction of husbands without public attribution of fault. Central to the text is the assertion that women’s devotional constancy should be acknowledged, yet pastoral focus must shift to men, deemed more instrumental in household governance and spiritual leadership. The instructions require mediation through the First Week of the Spiritual Exercises before absolution in marital disputes and stress impartiality, urging clergy to hear both spouses before discerning blame. Final recourse is directed to the Diocesan Bishop or Vicar General when reconciliation fails. Written in early modern ecclesiastical Portuguese with ascetic and disciplinary intent, the text reflects hierarchical gender norms, sacramental confidentiality, and the institutional Church’s role in regulating domestic life under colonial rule. This fragment provides critical insight into the intersection of religious authority, gender politics, and pastoral discipline in the Portuguese imperial context.

This historical lease agreement, dated 1 January 1928 (first day of the first month in the seventeenth year of the Republic of China), documents the rental of an urban dwelling house by Chow Tunkwu from the Catholic Church. The document specifies an annual rent of three dollars and fifty cents in silver coinage, payable monthly, with a five-dollar deposit paid in advance. The landlord assumes responsibility for all repairs, including structural damage, roof leaks, and cleaning. Termination provisions require one month’s notice from the tenant and at least one day’s notice from the landlord in the event of re-letting. The agreement is formalised through signatures and seals, including those of the lessee, Chow Tunkwu, and a witness, Li Tseng (name partially damaged). The text is accompanied by multiple official and institutional stamps, including a 'Rent Tax' stamp (租稅), a contract designation (约), and a revenue stamp denoting one cent (壹分), indicating fiscal registration. A watermark and central seal bearing the Latin motto "LUX IN TENEBRIS LUCET" and the name "CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY", alongside the values "VERITAS" and "BONITAS", suggest institutional involvement by a Catholic educational or ecclesiastical body, potentially linked to a university. This primary source offers valuable insight into early Republican-era urban tenancy practices, property management, and the role of religious institutions in housing and legal administration in China during the late 1920s.