Your search

Semi-Annual Report of the Chinese Missionaries - including position of Hong Kong as British Colony.

年代： 清康熙8年(1669)11月16日地点： 刻立地：北京市西城區北營房北街(馬尾溝)教堂 內容 皇帝奇祭原任通政使司通政使加二級又加一级掌欽天監印務事故湯若望之曰鞠躬盡瘁臣子之芳踪䘏死報勤國家之盛典尔湯若望來自西域曉習天文特界象曆之司爰錫通㣲教師之號遽爾長逝 朕用悼焉特加恩䘏遣官致祭嗚呼聿垂不朽之榮庶匪躬之報尔如有知尚克歆享 康熙八年十一月十六日耶穌會士湯公之墓

清康熙4年(1665)卒 刻立地：北京市西城區北營房北街(馬尾溝)教堂

中題：“耶穌會士利公之墓” 明萬曆38年(1610)卒 刻立地：北京市西城區北營房北街(馬尾溝)教堂

中題：“耶穌會士鄭公之墓” 清康熙12年(1673)4月11日卒 刻立地：北京市西城區北營房北街(馬尾溝)教堂

This transcription comprises the official acts and decrees of the First Plenary Council of China, convened in Shanghai in 1924 under the authority of the Apostolic Delegate, Archbishop Celsus Costantini, Titular Archbishop of Theodosia. The document records canonical legislation, administrative directives, and pastoral guidelines formulated by forty-six bishops, three apostolic prefects, and thirty-seven religious superiors for the governance of Catholic missions across China. It addresses ecclesiastical structure, sacramental discipline, clerical formation, missionary conduct, and relations with civil authorities and non-Christian traditions. Central themes include the establishment of quasi-parishes, regulation of Chinese rites, prohibition of superstition, promotion of indigenous clergy, and the integration of mission territories into universal canon law. The text also contains petitions to the Holy See concerning matrimonial dispensations, liturgical faculties, and the dogmatic definition of Mary as Mediatrix of All Graces, alongside procedural norms for matrimonial tribunals and educational institutions. As a foundational ecclesiastical record, it reflects the institutionalisation of the Catholic Church in early twentieth-century China within the framework of Roman centralisation and colonial-era mission policy.

This is a formal ecclesiastical dispatch dated 1 June 1891, issued by António, Bishop of Macau, to the Governor of Macau and Timor, in response to an official inquiry concerning the destruction of Catholic chapels in Hainan during the 1884 persecution. The document details the historical presence of Portuguese missionaries in Hainan since their initial establishment in 1630 by Father Bento de Mattos, including the founding of chapels in Kim-tchau-fu and interior settlements. It outlines the expulsion of Jesuits in 1769, the re-establishment of the mission in 1795, and subsequent French involvement until their withdrawal in 1876, after which Portuguese missionaries resumed control. The Bishop refutes claims that Chinese Christians owned or destroyed the chapels, asserting that all properties were constructed and maintained with mission funds—totaling nearly 3,000 taels by 1890—and thus belonged exclusively to the Catholic Church under canonical and treaty-based rights. He rejects the validity of forced apostasy declarations and denounces the Viceroy of the Two Quangs’ evasive responses to diplomatic inquiries, drawing parallels with prior cases involving French, British, and Spanish claims. The text includes detailed expenditures, administrative correspondence, and arguments for indemnity, emphasizing that just reparation is essential for the resumption of missionary activity. Attached documents substantiate financial outlays and diplomatic efforts, positioning the dispute within broader Sino-foreign treaty relations and colonial religious policy in late 19th-century South China.

This 1891 diplomatic dispatch, originating from the Portuguese Consulate in Canton and addressed to a high-ranking official in Lisbon, constitutes a formal report on political, administrative, and territorial tensions between Portuguese and Chinese authorities concerning Macau and its dependencies. The document details the shifting stance of local Chinese officials following communications from the Portuguese Ministry of the Navy, noting a cessation of objections to consular requests for interpreters. It highlights the influence of Viceroy Chang-chi-ting—a key anti-European figure—and his role in formulating opposition to Portuguese interests, particularly through a memorial submitted during Sino-Portuguese treaty negotiations. The text raises concerns over Chinese encroachment on Macau’s jurisdiction, citing the arrest of bailiffs on Taipa Island and the circulation of administrative notices asserting Chinese authority over local populations. Reference is made to the Green Island (Ilha Verde) dispute as precedent for covert jurisdictional claims. The author warns against potential threats to Coloane and Taipa, where Portuguese military presence remains limited amidst a significantly larger Chinese population. Administrative practices, including falsified inspection reports submitted to the Tsung-li Yamen, are presented as evidence of systematic efforts to erode Portuguese control. Additional matters include unresolved diplomatic notes on Hainan, delays in Sino-Portuguese negotiations, persecution of French Catholic missions in northern China attributed to anti-Manchu secret societies, and observations on rice trade dynamics affecting Macau. The document provides critical insight into colonial diplomacy, jurisdictional contestation, and power asymmetries in late 19th-century South China.

Volume 1 includes: Sculpture and Painting; Volume 2 includes: Liturgical vestments and Silver

Folder with 17 documents from 1967 to 1970.

Folder with fourteen documents

This archival document comprises a 1967 Portuguese colonial administrative file (Process No. 1–7–1, File D-7-1) originating from the Ministry of the Overseas Territories and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, concerning ecclesiastical governance in the Province of Macau under Portuguese administration. It includes a confidential memorandum dated 3 June 1967 from the Governor of Macau to the Ministry, reporting internal divisions among the diocesan clergy, criticism of Bishop Paulo Tavares’s authoritarian pastoral administration, and concerns regarding the influence of his brother, who served as his Secretary. The file documents diplomatic exchanges between Lisbon and the Holy See—particularly with Archbishop Agostino Casaroli (erroneously referred to in the original as ‘Monsignor Samoré’)—regarding the Holy See’s preliminary consideration of appointing a Chinese-origin Auxiliary Bishop for Macau as a contingency measure in anticipation of potential sovereignty changes. It records the appointment of Chinese and Eurasian clergy to key posts—including Canon António André Ngan (Vicar General and Chantre), Reverend João Paulo de Sousa (Rector), and Reverend Cláudio Maria Leão Ló (Vice-Rector)—and notes the candidacy of Reverend Dr. Massa. The document further details Vatican assessments of Bishop Tavares’s suitability for reassignment to Rome or a Central American nunciature, and reflects sustained Portuguese diplomatic efforts to forestall the appointment of a Chinese auxiliary bishop. Dated between March and June 1967, the file is held in the Arquivo Histórico Ultramarino (AHU), Conselho Ultramarino—Índia, Caixa 14.

Folder with six documents

Folder with 11 documents

Folder with four letters, July-August 1965.

Folder with seven documents about protestant missions in Macau.

Folder with six documents

Folder with one set of documents