Your search
Results 321 resources
-
This 1924 ecclesiastical letter, authored by the Bishop of Macau and addressed to the Portuguese Minister to the Vatican, constitutes a formal response to the Decree of 30 October 1923 issued by the Sacred Congregation for Extraordinary Ecclesiastical Affairs, which extended the authority of the Apostolic Delegate in China to the Diocese of Macau. The document outlines the historical jurisdictional isolation of the Diocese of Macau under the Portuguese Padroado system, detailing its dependence on the Metropolitan See of Goa and the Apostolic Nunciature in Lisbon for communications with the Holy See. The bishop argues that this arrangement resulted in practical disadvantages, including exclusion from episcopal conferences, denial of voting rights, and inability to access mission subsidies from the Society for the Propagation of the Faith, despite hierarchical parity with Apostolic Vicars in China. He recounts personal experiences from his tenure as Vicar Capitular in 1918 and his non-participation in preparatory meetings for the First Chinese National Council due to jurisdictional ambiguities. The letter asserts that the 1923 Decree, while ending a long-standing privilege, effectively integrates the Diocese of Macau into the broader Chinese ecclesiastical structure, granting equal faculties, inclusion in decision-making processes, and improved access to resources. The author concludes that the measure resolves longstanding administrative and pastoral impediments, affirming its benefits for the mission in China. This primary source is critical for understanding ecclesiastical politics, colonial religious patronage, and Sino-Vatican relations in early 20th-century East Asia.
-
Official correspondence between the Portuguese Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Portuguese Minister to the Holy See, dated 11 February 1921, concerning the establishment of the Apostolic Vicariate of Western Kwangtung and Hainan by papal decree (*Littera Apostolica*) of 1 August 1920. The document examines potential implications for the territorial jurisdiction of the Diocese of Macau, a Portuguese ecclesiastical see in China, following the reorganisation of Catholic missionary territories in southern China under the authority of the Holy See. Referencing a dispatch from Rome dated 5 January 1921, the letter outlines the newly defined boundaries of the vicariate—detached from the former Vicariate of Canton—and notes its assignment to the Paris Foreign Missions Society. Of particular concern is whether this reorganisation diminishes the Diocese of Macau’s jurisdiction without prior consultation, which the Portuguese government views as potentially detrimental to its interests. The communication includes a request for verification of any boundary changes affecting Macau and seeks guidance on diplomatic responses should such alterations be confirmed. Accompanying telegraphic records from 1950, related to administrative protocols of the Italian telegraph service, appear as archival annotations but are not part of the original 1921 diplomatic exchange. This document provides insight into early 20th-century church-state relations, colonial ecclesiastical policy, and Portuguese diplomatic oversight of its overseas dioceses within the context of Vatican-led reorganisations in East Asia.
-
This 1923 diplomatic dispatch, dated 27 January and sent from Rome by J. P. to the Portuguese Minister of Foreign Affairs, constitutes a confidential report on ecclesiastical and political tensions surrounding Portugal’s Padroado rights in India. The document records discussions held with Monsignor Borgongini and the Cardinal Secretary of State regarding sustained campaigns against the Portuguese patronage system in Indian territories, particularly Goa, Daman, and Cochin. Drawing on information provided by Portuguese prelates, including the Archbishop of Goa and the Bishops of Daman and Cochin, the author characterises the opposition as tendentious and malevolent, driven by both indigenous and British actors—ecclesiastical and lay—and supported by formal complaints submitted to the Vatican, often through the British minister. The correspondence highlights the volume of anti-Padroado petitions and press coverage forwarded to the Holy See, calling for abolition or radical reform. A key allegation addressed is Portugal’s alleged failure to meet financial obligations to mission personnel, which the author acknowledges has occurred due to administrative delays, leading to public embarrassment. Despite these challenges, the author affirms that the Holy See reaffirmed Portugal’s rights, with both the Cardinal Secretary and Monsignor Borgongini explicitly stating no intention to alter the status quo—a position aligned with Pope Benedict XV’s earlier assurances. The dispatch concludes with an assessment that while the campaign will likely persist, vigilant defence of the Padroado may render it ineffective.
-
This 1900 diplomatic memorandum, originating from the Portuguese Embassy to the Holy See in Rome, documents negotiations between the governments of Portugal and France concerning the ecclesiastical jurisdiction of Hainan Island in southern China. The text records that Hainan had been provisionally placed under the Diocese of Macau by the Holy See in 1875–76, but due to limited clergy and logistical challenges, the Bishop of Macau had not effectively evangelised the island. In light of the Paris Foreign Missions Society’s growing capacity within the Apostolic Prefecture of Guangdong, the French government proposed transferring Hainan back to Cantonese ecclesiastical authority. Portugal conditionally assented, requiring in exchange the extension of the Bishop of Macau’s jurisdiction over the district of Chao Hing (Gao Hing), adjacent to existing territories under his spiritual control. The agreement was to be implemented *provisoria tantum ratione*—on a provisional basis only—with territorial delimitations subject to prior approval by the Holy See. The document includes multiple memoranda from 1898–1900 exchanged between diplomatic representatives in Lisbon, Paris, and Rome, including communications involving Mr Avoye, Mr Delcassé, and the Apostolic Nuncio. It reflects the intersection of colonial diplomacy, ecclesiastical administration, and imperial interests in late 19th-century China, illustrating how religious jurisdiction served as both a spiritual and political instrument in Sino-European relations.
Explore
Primary Sources
-
Full-text online
(139)
- Transcriptions (101)
- Location (305)
- Published (1)
Subject Headings
Resource type
Publication year
-
Between 1500 and 1599
(2)
-
Between 1560 and 1569
(1)
- 1567 (1)
-
Between 1570 and 1579
(1)
- 1576 (1)
-
Between 1560 and 1569
(1)
-
Between 1700 and 1799
(15)
-
Between 1730 and 1739
(1)
- 1732 (1)
- Between 1740 and 1749 (6)
-
Between 1750 and 1759
(1)
- 1755 (1)
- Between 1770 and 1779 (5)
-
Between 1780 and 1789
(1)
- 1782 (1)
-
Between 1790 and 1799
(1)
- 1799 (1)
-
Between 1730 and 1739
(1)
-
Between 1800 and 1899
(119)
- Between 1800 and 1809 (4)
- Between 1810 and 1819 (2)
- Between 1820 and 1829 (3)
-
Between 1830 and 1839
(1)
- 1838 (1)
- Between 1840 and 1849 (42)
-
Between 1850 and 1859
(1)
- 1854 (1)
- Between 1860 and 1869 (13)
-
Between 1870 and 1879
(1)
- 1870 (1)
- Between 1880 and 1889 (7)
- Between 1890 and 1899 (45)
-
Between 1900 and 1999
(162)
- Between 1900 and 1909 (49)
-
Between 1910 and 1919
(6)
- 1911 (6)
- Between 1920 and 1929 (34)
- Between 1930 and 1939 (15)
- Between 1940 and 1949 (11)
- Between 1960 and 1969 (44)
-
Between 1970 and 1979
(2)
- 1972 (2)
-
Between 1980 and 1989
(1)
- 1981 (1)
- Unknown (23)