Your search
Results 338 resources
-
Vernacular conflict related to housing and rent in Fuzhou mediated by Club Lusitano, Fuzhou
-
Diverse functions executed by Club Lusitano in Fuzhou for Portuguese citizens
-
Confidential political intelligence report issued by the General Consulate of Portugal in Canton on 31 January 1939, documenting conditions in Japanese-occupied South China during the Sino-Japanese Conflict. The document, part of a series of periodic reports (No. 20, reference 267–270, 276), examines Japanese occupation policies in Canton and Guangdong Province, focusing on forced repatriation of refugees, economic exploitation, public health deterioration, and systematic appropriation of property under military control. It analyses political dynamics including Chiang Kai-shek’s delayed resistance, the contested patriotism of Wang Jingwei’s peace advocacy, and public scepticism toward Japanese diplomatic overtures. The report details coercive tactics used to repopulate Canton, including forced displacement from surrounding villages and deceptive resettlement campaigns extending to Macau. Infrastructure such as schools and transport is described as reorganised for Japanese ideological and logistical purposes without substantive investment. Widespread squalor, absence of basic utilities, and unhygienic living conditions are recorded, alongside arbitrary security levies and unchecked criminal activity. The text further notes repeated violations of Portuguese interests, including the seizure of cargo from Portuguese vessels near Shameen and the looting of Dr. John Tong’s residence. Ecclesiastical properties along the West River, previously declared to Japanese authorities, were bombed, causing substantial damage. Despite formal protests, accountability remains absent. The report concludes that Japanese occupation, marked by repression and economic strain, fails to gain popular acceptance and mirrors broader patterns across occupied China.
-
A large set of documents detailing the complex acquisition of radios for the mission during the war time. Only radio receivers were allowed.
-
Diverse documents related to canned fish trade between Macau and Portugal.
-
Diverse documents and correspondence regarding the plans for the air connection between US and Macau.
-
Diverse documents and correspondence related to the work on reclamation in the proximity of Macau. The river conservancy commission is in a separate document.
-
Organization of the Lottery in the name of Santa Casa de Misericordia
-
Correspondence regarding the visit of the battleship Macau to the Portuguese mission in Shiu Hing and possible need of evacuation.
-
This official correspondence, dated 21 October 1926, originates from the Secretariat of State of His Holiness at the Vatican and is addressed to His Excellency Augusto de Castro, Minister of Portugal to the Holy See. The document, classified under reference number 57145 and marked for citation in reply, serves as a formal invitation to a significant ecclesiastical event. It announces that on Thursday, 28 October 1926, at 8 a.m., Pope Pius XI will confer episcopal consecration upon six Chinese bishops in the Vatican Basilica. The undersigned, Cardinal Pietro Gasparri, Cardinal Secretary of State, extends the invitation to the Portuguese Minister and the entire staff of his Legation, noting that members of the Most Eminent Diplomatic Corps will be granted access through the Porta di Santa Marta. This primary source reflects the diplomatic protocols of the Holy See during the early 20th century and highlights the internationalisation of the Catholic Church’s hierarchy, particularly in relation to China. As a formal state communication within Vatican diplomatic channels, the document provides evidence of Sino-Vatican ecclesiastical relations and the integration of non-European clergy into the episcopate during the interwar period. It is a valuable resource for researchers examining religious diplomacy, colonial-era ecclesiastical policy, and the globalisation of Catholicism in the 1920s.
-
This 1926 diplomatic memorandum, issued by the Portuguese Ministry of Foreign Affairs’ General Directorate of Political and Diplomatic Affairs, addresses ecclesiastical jurisdictional disputes between the Portuguese Crown and the Holy See concerning dioceses under the Padroado system in British India and Asia. Dated 5 May 1926 and addressed to the Portuguese Minister Plenipotentiary to the Holy See, the document analyses a proposed agreement on the reorganisation of Portuguese ecclesiastical jurisdictions, specifically Goa, Daman, Cochin, Mylapore, and potentially Macau. It outlines Portugal’s position on four key issues: approval of boundary modifications only with governmental consent; extension of the state’s response period to three months in episcopal appointments; clarification that the semi-Padroado arrangements over Indian dioceses such as Bombay, Trichinopoly, Quilon, and Mangalore should remain subject to Portuguese input; and strong objections to the proposed transfer of spiritual jurisdiction over enclaved Padroado Christian communities to local bishops under Propaganda Fide. The author, Vasco Inge (or Vase Boye), argues that such transfers—particularly affecting Daman and Mylapore, which would lose up to half or one-third of their Christian populations—would cause severe institutional harm. Instead, he proposes a system of territorial compensation based on reciprocal exchanges of equivalent Christian populations, citing precedent from the 1923 establishment of Tuticorin. The document underscores Portugal’s determination to preserve its historic patronage rights while advocating for negotiated, equitable solutions to complex transcolonial ecclesiastical governance challenges.
Explore
Primary Sources
-
Full-text online
(139)
- Transcriptions (99)
- Location (163)
- Published (1)
Subject Headings
Resource type
Publication year
-
Between 1500 and 1599
(2)
-
Between 1560 and 1569
(1)
- 1567 (1)
-
Between 1570 and 1579
(1)
- 1576 (1)
-
Between 1560 and 1569
(1)
-
Between 1700 and 1799
(13)
- Between 1740 and 1749 (5)
-
Between 1750 and 1759
(1)
- 1755 (1)
- Between 1770 and 1779 (5)
-
Between 1780 and 1789
(1)
- 1782 (1)
-
Between 1790 and 1799
(1)
- 1799 (1)
-
Between 1800 and 1899
(130)
- Between 1800 and 1809 (7)
- Between 1810 and 1819 (2)
- Between 1820 and 1829 (3)
- Between 1830 and 1839 (2)
- Between 1840 and 1849 (44)
-
Between 1850 and 1859
(1)
- 1854 (1)
- Between 1860 and 1869 (13)
-
Between 1870 and 1879
(1)
- 1870 (1)
- Between 1880 and 1889 (7)
- Between 1890 and 1899 (50)
-
Between 1900 and 1999
(174)
- Between 1900 and 1909 (59)
-
Between 1910 and 1919
(6)
- 1911 (6)
- Between 1920 and 1929 (35)
- Between 1930 and 1939 (16)
- Between 1940 and 1949 (11)
- Between 1960 and 1969 (44)
-
Between 1970 and 1979
(2)
- 1972 (2)
-
Between 1980 and 1989
(1)
- 1981 (1)
- Unknown (19)