Your search
Results 110 resources
-
This is a formal ecclesiastical decree promulgated in 1704 and reaffirmed in 1707 by Charles Thomas Mallare, Patriarch of Antioch and Apostolic Vicar with *legatus a latere* faculties, alongside Brother Beda, Bishop and Most Reverend Provincial of the Neocor Missionaries Apostolic in China and Siam, and later endorsed by Lazarus Carneiro and Francis, Apostolic Vicars of Cambodia. Issued on 7 December 1704 and formally published on 7 February 1707 at Matani Nankiri, the document establishes binding canonical regulations for all missionaries—secular and regular, including Jesuits—serving in the missions of China, Siam, and Cambodia. It addresses five critical questions concerning the compatibility of Chinese and Southeast Asian ritual practices with Catholic doctrine, specifically delineating permissible civil veneration (*veneratio civilis*) of ancestors and cultural rites under strict conditions, while explicitly prohibiting participation in or endorsement of the ‘Sacrifice to Heaven’ (*Conchaji*), state cults (*Dovenis*), veneration of the ‘Tablet of the Ruler of Heaven’ (*T’ien-chu P’ai*), and local folk rituals (*geghili*). The decree invokes papal authority—including decrees of Urban VIII and Clement XI—and imposes automatic excommunication for non-compliance, reserving absolution solely to the Holy See or, in cases of imminent death, to the Society of Jesus under narrowly defined conditions. It constitutes a foundational regulatory text for the Chinese Rites Controversy within the early modern Catholic missionary enterprise.
-
This 1907–1909 diplomatic and ecclesiastical correspondence, originating from the French Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Ministry of the Colonies, documents the protracted negotiation and eventual transfer of religious jurisdiction over Hainan Island from Portuguese to French Catholic missions. Rooted in the 1857 and 1886 Concordats between the Holy See and Portugal, the dispute centres on the retrocession of Hainan—formally under the Bishop of Macao’s jurisdiction—to the French Apostolic Vicariate of Guangdong, led by Bishop Jean M. Mercier (Mérel). Despite a 1903 decree by the Congregation for the Propagation of the Faith and a clarifying pontifical decree of 16 March 1904 confirming the exchange of Hainan for the Chaoqingfu (Zhaoqing) district—excluding three contested sub-prefectures—the implementation was delayed due to disputes over property valuation and compensation. The Bishop of Macao, d’Azevedo, acknowledged a 41,073 piastre deficit in favour of the French mission, but refused indemnity payments, prompting resistance from Mercier. The file reveals inter-imperial tensions between France and Portugal, with both states leveraging ecclesiastical authority to advance colonial influence in southern China. By October 1908, French missionaries formally assumed control of Hainan, though concerns persisted regarding inadequate financial support, competition from American and German Protestant missions, and the strategic implications for French political influence. The documents provide critical insight into the intersection of religious diplomacy, colonial ambition, and Sino-Vatican relations in late Qing China.
-
Book digitized by the Bibliotheca Curiae Societatis Iesu; Book digitized by the Bibliotheca Curiae Societatis Iesu
-
Na história colonial do Extremo Oriente, durante os séculos XVI e XVII e na história dos missionários católicos, o Padroado ocupa uma posição muito importante. Portugal, Espanha, França e a Santa Sé realizaram uma intensa competição pelo Padroado, o que teve uma profunda influência na história. Espero, através desta dissertação, conhecer melhor a história do Padroado Português no Extremo Oriente, bem como através da investigação dos documentos e outros materiais encontrados resumir os impactos do Padroado Português e os seus papéis nas ex-colónias ultramarinas, particularmente dando atenção à forma como Portugal completou o domínio colonial de Macau no período das dinastias Ming e Qing. O primeiro capítulo introduz algumas possibilidades sobre o ensino das relações históricas sino-portuguesas na aprendizagem do português. O segundo capítulo refere a influência e o papel de Portugal no processo de desenvolvimento do Padroado português, a intenção do Papa na concessão do Padroado do Extremo Oriente a Portugal, os impactos do acesso ao Padroado do Extremo Oriente a Portugal. Foi feita também uma análise de várias atividades seculares do Padroado do Extremo Oriente em que os missionários portugueses participaram. No terceiro capítulo é abordada principalmente a relação entre Portugal e a China durante as dinastias Ming e Qing, e como Portugal entrou em Macau com sucesso e esta se tornou numa das suas colónias ultramarinas. O último capítulo resume o importante papel desempenhado pelo Padroado do Extremo Oriente no processo colonial no exterior e apresenta a análise feita, com base nos dois capítulos anteriores, do estabelecimento e manutenção de relações de negócios, fornecendo informações de negócios e participação na administração colonial, assim como o envolvimento em atividades de negócios e outras atividades seculares. É referida a eficácia secular do Padroado do Extremo Oriente e a sua ajuda na consolidação e desenvolvimento dos interesses coloniais portugueses no Extremo Oriente.
-
This 1826 administrative document, originating from the Royal College of St Joseph in Macao, China, comprises a formal submission by its Superior, Joaquim José Monteiro Torres, addressed to a high-ranking colonial or ecclesiastical official. The letter transmits an enclosed petition concerning the welfare of missionary activities under the Royal Patronage of the Portuguese Crown, requesting its forwarding to the "Royal Presence" of the August Lord D.º G.º. Signed by both Monteiro Torres and Nuciao Rodrigues Osório de Borja, the document reflects institutional efforts to coordinate ecclesiastical affairs within the Portuguese imperial framework in Asia. Endorsed with marginal annotations indicating administrative routing—specifically instructions to communicate the matter to the Bishop of Macao on 2 April 1827, preceded by earlier notations dating to 23 March and 1 April 1827—the manuscript reveals procedural aspects of colonial governance and church-state relations in the late Portuguese Empire. Originally archived under references linked to the Historical Archive of Portugal (AHU_CU_Índia, Cx. 14, D. 84), the document bears a circular seal associated with Portuguese historical documentation. As a primary source, it provides insight into the bureaucratic mechanisms supporting Catholic missions in Macao during the early 19th century, illustrating the interplay between religious institutions and imperial authority in a colonial Asian context.
Explore
Primary Sources
-
Full-text online
(12)
- Transcriptions (6)
-
Location
(62)
- Brasil (4)
- France (1)
- India (5)
- Italy (1)
- Mexico (1)
-
Portugal
(40)
- Arquivo da Santa Casa da Misericórdia de Ponte de Lima (1)
- Arquivo Diplomático do Ministério dos Negocios Estrangeiros (13)
- Arquivo Histórico Ultramarino (2)
- Arquivo Nacional. Torre do Tombo (2)
- Biblioteca da Universidade de Coimbra (1)
- Biblioteca Nacional (16)
- Biblioteca Pública de Évora (4)
- Centro Científico e Cultural de Macau (1)
- Spain (9)
-
United Kingdom
(1)
- British Museum (1)
Subject Headings
-
Institutions
- Augustinians (3)
- Franciscans (11)
- Holy House of Mercy (6)
- Inquisition (Goa, Macau) (9)
- Jesuits (27)
- MEP - Mission Étrangéres de Paris (2)
- Portuguese "Padroado" (51)
- Propaganda Fide (12)
- Salesians (1)
- Bishops of Macau (5)
- Chinese Rites (1)
- Devotions (1)
- Hainan Mission (6)
Resource type
- Audio Recording (1)
- Book (30)
- Conference Paper (1)
- Journal Article (15)
- Letter (1)
- Manuscript (59)
- Thesis (2)
- Video Recording (1)
Publication year
- Between 1500 and 1599 (9)
-
Between 1600 and 1699
(15)
-
Between 1600 and 1609
(2)
- 1609 (2)
- Between 1620 and 1629 (2)
-
Between 1630 and 1639
(1)
- 1634 (1)
- Between 1640 and 1649 (6)
- Between 1670 and 1679 (2)
-
Between 1680 and 1689
(1)
- 1687 (1)
-
Between 1690 and 1699
(1)
- 1690 (1)
-
Between 1600 and 1609
(2)
- Between 1700 and 1799 (7)
-
Between 1800 and 1899
(16)
-
Between 1800 and 1809
(2)
- 1802 (2)
-
Between 1820 and 1829
(1)
- 1826 (1)
-
Between 1840 and 1849
(8)
- 1842 (8)
-
Between 1850 and 1859
(1)
- 1858 (1)
-
Between 1860 and 1869
(1)
- 1869 (1)
-
Between 1870 and 1879
(1)
- 1872 (1)
- Between 1880 and 1889 (2)
-
Between 1800 and 1809
(2)
-
Between 1900 and 1999
(27)
- Between 1900 and 1909 (7)
- Between 1910 and 1919 (3)
- Between 1920 and 1929 (3)
- Between 1930 and 1939 (2)
- Between 1940 and 1949 (2)
- Between 1950 and 1959 (2)
- Between 1960 and 1969 (2)
-
Between 1970 and 1979
(2)
- 1973 (2)
-
Between 1980 and 1989
(1)
- 1985 (1)
- Between 1990 and 1999 (3)
- Between 2000 and 2026 (20)
- Unknown (16)