Your search

This document comprises a series of translated ecclesiastical letters and administrative texts, primarily dating from the late 18th century, with supplementary material likely transcribed from earlier periods. Central to the collection is a 1799 letter from Pope Pius VI addressed to Friar Manuel de Santa Catarina, Archbishop of Goa, concerning jurisdictional disputes over the Island of Bombay. The text details the Holy See’s decision to grant temporary spiritual authority to Apostolic Vicars of the Mughal Empire following the expulsion of Portuguese ecclesiastical personnel by English authorities beginning in 1718. It affirms that the Archbishop of Goa retains full jurisdiction over Bombay in principle, but its exercise was suspended due to political impediments. The Pope justifies the delegation of pastoral care to vicars as a necessity for the spiritual survival of Catholics under non-Catholic rule, citing apostolic duty over institutional rivalry. The document further includes a corrupted or abbreviated transcription—possibly from a damaged colonial-era manuscript—referencing ecclesiastical appointments, synodal authority, fiscal obligations, and jurisdictional claims within a Portuguese colonial context. Names such as Gudricus Vovatus, Danceranus, and Athabasy appear in unclear administrative or hierarchical roles, while terms like “arm of the Conclave” and “fisc” suggest institutional governance. A translator’s note indicates significant linguistic irregularities, potentially arising from scribal abbreviation, hybrid Latin-Iberian legal forms, or textual corruption. This compilation offers critical insight into colonial ecclesiastical politics, papal diplomacy, and the interplay between imperial authority and Church jurisdiction in the Portuguese empire.

This is a papal letter, dated 16 January 1746, issued by Pope Benedict XIV from Saint Mary Major during the sixth year of his pontificate, and addressed to John, King of Portugal and the Algarves. The document, transmitted via the Archbishop of Lodi, expresses the Pope’s formal gratitude to the Portuguese monarch for his support in restoring ecclesiastical order within the archdiocese following a prolonged vacancy marked by administrative disorder and entrenched abuses. The Pope commends the King’s decisive interventions, particularly through the Marquis of Castelnuovo, his Secretary, who executed royal directives with precision and dedication. Highlighting the progress achieved under divine grace, the letter underscores the monarch’s pious governance and active role in upholding the Church’s spiritual mission. The Pope affirms that such benefactions warrant enduring recognition both in secular annals and ecclesiastical records, placing the King among the most distinguished Christian rulers of history. Central to the letter is the theme of cooperation between secular authority and religious office in maintaining clerical discipline and effective pastoral care. The document concludes with the Pope’s assurance of continued prayers for the King and his Royal Family, accompanied by the Apostolic Blessing. This letter constitutes a significant record of Church-state relations in mid-eighteenth-century Catholic Europe, reflecting the diplomatic and spiritual priorities of the Holy See.

This abstract describes a historical ecclesiastical document comprising two papal letters from Pope Benedict XIV, both addressed to Portuguese monarchs and ecclesiastical authorities in the context of Portuguese colonial administration in Asia. The first is a copy of a letter dated 26 January 1716, addressed to King John V of Portugal, expressing gratitude for royal support extended to the Archbishop of Lisbon regarding his journey. The second, dated 26 January 1746 and bearing marginalia indicating 26 February 1746 and ‘Document 42 of 551’, is an original papal letter addressed to the Archbishop of Goa, acknowledging his successful restoration of order following a prolonged vacancy of the archdiocesan see, and commending the protective role of the King of Portugal and the diligent execution of royal instructions by the Marquis of Castelnuovo, Viceroy of Portuguese India. The letter reaffirms papal endorsement of the monarch’s conduct, invokes divine intercession, and bestows the Apostolic Blessing upon the King and his Royal Family. Both letters were issued from Rome at the Basilica of Saint Mary Major; the 1746 letter is formally dated in the sixth year of Benedict XIV’s pontificate. The document originates from a collection indexed with orientalist classification (‘f. Oriente — m. 1 — doc.’) and bears the provenance marker ‘Ustoro’. It serves as primary evidence of Vatican-Portuguese diplomatic and ecclesiastical relations concerning the governance of the Archdiocese of Goa during the early modern period.

This collection, catalogued as JAP. SIN. 141, comprises documents pertaining to the Chinese Rites Controversy spanning from 1720 to 1737. The documents offer a multifaceted view of the dispute, incorporating perspectives from various individuals and religious orders involved. The collection includes transcriptions of diaries concerning the Mezzabarba legation from Emperor Kam Hi, summaries of Roman decisions and concessions related to the rites (1645-1720), and testimonies regarding the innocence of the Jesuit order in China. Correspondence within the collection sheds light on the Jansenism in Cocincina and developments in missions across China and other Eastern territories. Furthermore, the series contains a historical overview of the mission in China from 1583 to 1737, highlighting the initial acceptance and subsequent extinction of Christianity before its re-establishment by Jesuit missionaries . It also delves into the examination of Chinese customs and the ensuing debates regarding the compatibility of certain rites with Christian doctrine. The documents reflect the differing viewpoints and resolutions concerning the rites, including papal decrees and the positions of various religious orders such as the Franciscans and Dominicans. They also touch upon the implications of these controversies on the Chinese mission and the challenges faced by missionaries in administering sacraments and navigating imperial mandates.

奏報審辦鎮安縣天主教人犯趙金城等 具奏日期： 乾隆43年01月29日 (1778-02-25) 具奏人：陝西巡撫 畢沅 硃批日期： 乾隆43年02月15日 (1778-03-13) 硃批內容： 該部議奏 尺寸： 26×11.6(公分)

奏聞南唐縣民何國達呈首天主邪教一案經臣飛咨四川督臣嚴密查辦茲將准咨查辦緣由奏覽 具奏日期：乾隆39年03月20日 (1774-04-30) 具奏人： 江西巡撫 海成 硃批內容： 覽 文件類別： 奏摺 形制： 摺件 尺寸： 21.5×9.2(公分) 質材： 紙 出版品： 《宮中檔乾隆朝奏摺》第35輯，頁065

奏覆辦理婺川縣民蔣登庸家崇奉天主教一案情形 具奏日期：乾隆37年04月13日 (1772-05-15) 具奏人：護理貴州巡撫印務 圖思德 硃批日期：乾隆37年04月26日 (1772-05-28) 硃批內容：覽 尺寸：25.8×11.7(公分)

奏聞查辦婺州縣天主教由 具奏日期： 乾隆37年02月11日 (1772-03-14) 具奏人：護理貴州巡撫印務 覺羅圖思德 硃批日期： 乾隆37年02月23日 (1772-03-26) 硃批內容： 知道了 尺寸： 24×10(公分)

奏覆江西民人吳均在粵約請西洋人赴江西掌奉天主教拏獲奏報情形 具奏日期：乾隆32年09月08日 (1767-10-30) 具奏人：兩廣總督兼署廣東巡撫 李侍堯 硃批內容： 覽 文件類別： 奏摺 形制： 摺件 尺寸： 22×10.1(公分) 質材： 紙 出版品： 《宮中檔乾隆朝奏摺》第28輯，頁093

奏為臣親訊傳天主教人犯及准廣東咨提移解緣由 具奏日期： 乾隆32年08月10日 (1767-10-02) 具奏人： 江西巡撫 吳紹詩 硃批內容： 知道了 文件類別： 奏摺 形制： 摺件 尺寸： 22.2×10.4(公分) 質材： 紙 出版品： 《宮中檔乾隆朝奏摺》第27輯，頁755

奏為所有臣據稟查辦西洋人來江省宣傳天主教事宜 具奏日期： 乾隆32年閏07月19日 (1767-09-11) 具奏人：江西巡撫 吳紹詩 硃批內容：知道了 文件類別：奏摺 形制：摺件 尺寸：22.5×10.3(公分) 質材：紙 出版品： 《宮中檔乾隆朝奏摺》第27輯，頁579

奏報拏獲信天主教之江西民人蔣日達等五犯經查辦緣由先行呈覽 具奏日期：乾隆32年閏07月13日 (1767-09-05) 具奏人： 兩廣總督 李侍堯 具奏人：廣東巡撫 王檢 硃批內容：知道了 文件類別：奏摺 形制：摺件 尺寸：22.5×10.3(公分) 質材：紙 出版品： 《宮中檔乾隆朝奏摺》第27輯，頁538

奏報拿獲馮文子講天主教規應解還原籍摺 具奏日期：乾隆19年07月23日 (1754-09-09) 具奏人：閩浙總督兼理福建巡撫 喀爾吉善 硃批內容：知道了（另有夾批） 文件類別：奏摺 形制：摺件 尺寸：21.5×10.7(公分) 質材：紙 出版品：《宮中檔乾隆朝奏摺》第09輯，頁228

奏覆遵旨嚴禁天主教不必視同邪教摺 具奏日期：乾隆19年05月03日 (1754-06-22) 具奏人：廣東巡撫 鶴年 硃批內容：覽 文件類別：奏摺 形制：摺件 尺寸：22×10.5(公分) 質材：紙 出版品：《宮中檔乾隆朝奏摺》第08輯，頁415

奏報地方情形並查拿天主教教士事宜摺 具奏日期：乾隆19年閏04月09日 (1754-05-30) 具奏人：江蘇巡撫 莊有恭 硃批內容：覽奏俱悉 文件類別：奏摺 形制：摺件 尺寸：22×10.5(公分) 質材：紙 出版品： 《宮中檔乾隆朝奏摺》第08輯，頁219

奏報查勘堤工及拿獲天主教士摺 具奏日期：乾隆19年閏04月05日 (1754-05-26) 具奏人：兩江總督 鄂容安 硃批內容：覽奏俱悉 文件類別：奏摺 形制：摺件 尺寸：22×10.5(公分) 質材：紙 出版品：《宮中檔乾隆朝奏摺》第08輯，頁209

奏報審理信奉天主之人民並拿獲天主教西洋人犯摺 具奏日期： 乾隆19年04月22日 (1754-05-13) 具奏人：提督江南總兵官 林君陞 硃批內容：已有旨了 文件類別：奏摺 形制：摺件 尺寸：22×10.2(公分) 質材：紙 出版品：《宮中檔乾隆朝奏摺》第08輯，頁081