Your search
Results 337 resources
-
This 1860 diplomatic correspondence, comprising three despatches dated 25 and 26 June and 25 July, originates from the Portuguese Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs, Lynard, to António José d'Ávila J., Viscount of Mite, Minister of Her Majesty’s Government in Rome. The documents confirm receipt of multiple confidential communications from the Legation in Naples (Nos. 19, 21) and the extended series (Nos. 39, 40), along with a reserved despatch (No. 15), all concerning political developments on the Italian Peninsula during a period of significant upheaval. Central to the correspondence is the appointment of Count Alessandro Gallo as Vice-Consul of Portugal in Ancona, with instructions for the Minister to ensure the Count petitions the Ministry for the issuance of his Diplomatic Commission. Additionally, the Secretary of State transmits information relayed by Father Barroso regarding the frontier of Saint Joseph in Papo, forwarding a confidential extract to the Minister of Public Works. The despatches further request urgent clarification on colonial provisions necessary for the proposed renewal of a Commercial Treaty with Naples. These documents offer primary insight into Portugal’s diplomatic protocols, consular administration, and foreign policy considerations in mid-19th century Europe, particularly in relation to the shifting political landscape of the Italian states and colonial trade negotiations.
-
This 1844 ecclesiastical document, originating in Malacca and dated 10 February, comprises a formal declaration by José, Archbishop Primate of the East, addressed to the Commission representing the local Catholic community. It responds to jurisdictional disputes arising from claims by the Apostolic Vicar of Macau to assert authority over Malacca’s Catholics under the Papal Brief *Multa praeclare* and a 1840 decree of the Sacred Congregation. The Archbishop refutes the validity of these claims within Portuguese ecclesiastical territory, asserting that the Brief is either spurious or null due to existing agreements between the Holy See and the Portuguese Crown. He reaffirms the authority of Reverend Francisco Jones, Administrator of the Diocese, as his legitimate delegate, and instructs missionaries from the Propaganda Fide—Fathers Bergaudetti and Bervel—to withdraw immediately under penalty of disobedience. The text underscores the Archbishop’s full jurisdiction confirmed by Papal Bulls, including *Intr. L. Saldino*, and affirms loyalty to Pope Gregory XVI while rejecting extrajudicial interventions. Endorsed by the State Secretariat for Naval and Overseas Affairs on 15 April 1844 and the State Secretariat for Foreign Affairs on 16 April, this authenticated copy serves as a key record of colonial-era ecclesiastical politics, illustrating tensions between Roman centralisation efforts and entrenched Portuguese patronage rights in Southeast Asia.
-
This 1844 ecclesiastical letter, addressed to the British Government and copied to parties designated A° B. and the Metropolitan See (Metrópole), originates from João, Archbishop of Goa and Primate of the East, in response to a communication dated 12 December of the previous year. The document concerns a jurisdictional dispute over the Diocese of Malacca, focusing on Mgr. Francisco Jones, its Governor, who has refused to comply with a papal decree of 3 January 1840 issued by the Apostolic Secretary declaring his incapacity. Jones asserts allegiance solely to the Ecclesiastical Authority of Goa, rejecting external directives. The Archbishop invokes the authority conferred by Papal Bulls of Confirmation—equivalent to those granted to his predecessors—to assert full metropolitan jurisdiction, including over Malacca, and explicitly rejects the validity or continued applicability of the Brief *Multa podere*, whether genuine or clandestinely obtained, arguing that it has been superseded by subsequent provisions. Reference is made to an Encyclical Bull affirming the suffragan bishops’ obligation to obey the Archbishop of Goa, further undermining claims based on the earlier Brief. The letter firmly opposes British governmental intervention in the appointment of the Apostolic Vicar of Angapura and ecclesiastical matters in Malacca, demanding withdrawal from such affairs and unimpeded exercise of ecclesiastical authority by the legitimate diocesan governor. Signed by Archbishop João and countersigned by Reverend Fathers Burgandetti and Beverel, the text underscores the Holy See’s jurisdictional claims within a colonial context, reflecting tensions between ecclesiastical authority and imperial administration in mid-19th century Portuguese ecclesiastical provinces in Asia.
Explore
Primary Sources
-
Full-text online
(139)
- Transcriptions (100)
- Location (162)
- Published (1)
Subject Headings
Resource type
Publication year
-
Between 1500 and 1599
(2)
-
Between 1560 and 1569
(1)
- 1567 (1)
-
Between 1570 and 1579
(1)
- 1576 (1)
-
Between 1560 and 1569
(1)
-
Between 1700 and 1799
(13)
- Between 1740 and 1749 (5)
-
Between 1750 and 1759
(1)
- 1755 (1)
- Between 1770 and 1779 (5)
-
Between 1780 and 1789
(1)
- 1782 (1)
-
Between 1790 and 1799
(1)
- 1799 (1)
-
Between 1800 and 1899
(129)
- Between 1800 and 1809 (7)
- Between 1810 and 1819 (2)
- Between 1820 and 1829 (3)
-
Between 1830 and 1839
(1)
- 1838 (1)
- Between 1840 and 1849 (44)
-
Between 1850 and 1859
(1)
- 1854 (1)
- Between 1860 and 1869 (13)
-
Between 1870 and 1879
(1)
- 1870 (1)
- Between 1880 and 1889 (7)
- Between 1890 and 1899 (50)
-
Between 1900 and 1999
(174)
- Between 1900 and 1909 (59)
-
Between 1910 and 1919
(6)
- 1911 (6)
- Between 1920 and 1929 (35)
- Between 1930 and 1939 (16)
- Between 1940 and 1949 (11)
- Between 1960 and 1969 (44)
-
Between 1970 and 1979
(2)
- 1972 (2)
-
Between 1980 and 1989
(1)
- 1981 (1)
- Unknown (19)