Your search

In authors or contributors
  • The article argues that the historiography of maritime trade in Southeast and the Far East, often constructed from Iberian and Dutch sources, overestimates the centrality of “silk–silver” as an explanatory axis for the transition from the 16th to the 17th century. Countering this interpretation, the author mobilizes complementary evidence from Chinese and Japanese texts (including merchandise lists and administrative compilations), as well as data on exchanges between Korea, the Ryukyu Kingdom, and the Japanese archipelago, to reconstruct the circulation of animals and animal products and contextualize it within broader flows of goods. The methodology is essentially historiographic and comparative: it compares the weight assigned to certain goods by European sources with the relative importance suggested by catalogs, registers, and local documentation for different periods. The conclusions point to a strong continuity in the composition of commercial “baskets” between the late Middle Ages and the early modern period: the increasing emergence of Japanese silver does not imply an abrupt decline in exchanges considered traditional. On the contrary, the “new” circuits of silver and silk tended to coexist and, possibly, to drive the expansion of previously circulating products, articulated by regional institutional and political networks that included the circulation of animals and animal-derived products.

Last update from database: 9/15/26, 10:43 AM (UTC)

Explore