Your search

In authors or contributors
  • This article analyses the trajectories and historiographical debates surrounding the formation of the world-economy and the process of globalisation, focusing on the historical interactions between Asia and Europe. The author begins the reflection with a critique of the contemporary and vulgarised use of the concept of "globalisation," often presented by the media and political discourse in an ahistorical manner lacking conceptual rigour. It is argued that this simplistic view ignores the genealogy of the phenomenon and often serves to mask persistent asymmetries and old forms of domination between the Western centre and global peripheries. Through an epistemological review that engages with the theoretical frameworks of the "world-economy" — referencing the influence of figures such as Fernand Braudel and Immanuel Wallerstein — the study examines how globalisation has consolidated itself as a representation of Western rationality and power. The text explores the tension between the narrative of a technological "global village" and the reality of the structures of social and worldwide division of labour that keep vast populations on the margins of development. It concludes that historiography must recover the temporal density and spatial dynamics of Euro-Asian relations in order to overcome Eurocentric views that reduce global development to a mere *imitatio occidens*, underlining the need to understand globalisation as a long-term historical process marked by structural inequalities.

Last update from database: 9/14/26, 2:19 AM (UTC)

Explore